British

edit

The British governement was involved in this programme? I have not heard that, and it seems strange to me that they would be involved in this programme and Boxer MRAV at the same time. Perhaps it was a low level involvement. Can someone add details? David.j.james 08:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

According to other sources, the British gov was involved in this project, pulled out and got involved in Boxer MRAV, pulled out because it was too heavy for air transport, was involved in a program with the US that was cancelled, considered this vehicle again and now has selected an American vehicle! david j james (different login ) 81.223.81.160 (talk) 17:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

It appears to also be in the running for a Canadian contract. 64.229.101.183 (talk) 23:25, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 08:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Comparison with contemporary vehicles

edit

this chart on there, basically it have the VBCI as sole modern vehicle with bunch of unimportant legacy or totally obsolete vehicles it being compared to, and yeah LAV-25 and BTR-90 are legacy, the Egyptian and Chinese designs listed, outright obsolete. The comparison should be to likes of Swedish SEP, Finnish AMV, American STRYKER, and German BOXER, and maybe few others, like designs from Italy, and maybe Spain, Austria etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.220.213.83 (talk) 08:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Like this?
Comparison of some modern IFVs
  VBCI   Patria AMV   Stryker   Pandur II  /   Boxer
Weight 25.6 t (28.2 short tons) 26 t (29 short tons) 16.47 t (18.16 short tons) 22 t (24 short tons) 25.2 t (27.8 short tons)
Primary armament M811 25 mm auto cannon various configurations M68A1E4 105mm cannon or 40mm automatic grenade launcher MK19 or 12.7 mm heavy machine gun M2 Browning or 7.62mm caliber machine gun M240 various configurations 40mm automatic grenade launcher (Heckler & Koch GMG) or 12.7mm heavy machine gun (M3M)
Secondary armament coaxial 7.62mm machine gun
Road range 750 km (470 mi) 800 km (500 mi) 500 km (310 mi) 700 km (430 mi) 1,100 km (680 mi)
Maximum velocity (on road) 100 km/h (62 mph) 100 km/h (62 mph) 100 km/h (62 mph) 105 km/h (65 mph) 103 km/h (64 mph)
Capacity (maximum) 2 crew + 9 passengers 3 crew + 8 passengers 2 crew + 9 passengers 2 crew + 6 passengers 3 crew + 8 passengers
--noclador (talk) 17:52, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
I was wondering what's the point of having such a table on this article, it repeats info already mentioned for the vbci and adds info for totally unrelated vehicles. I think it should be removed. --Victor12 (talk) 18:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merge VBCI 2 into this page

edit

VBCI 2 should be merge into this page since it is just a new prototype version of the VBCI.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 22:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

    Y Merger complete. --Le Petit Chat (talk) 20:52, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 14 February 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 19:24, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


Véhicule blindé de combat d'infanterieVéhicule Blindé de Combat d'Infanterie – Revert unexplained 2008 move. It's a proper noun. Schierbecker (talk) 01:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 11:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Support move to VBCI – clearly the common name. Incidentally, the 2008 move was probably done to make the (decidedly French) title conform with French capitalization rules. They generally go easy on the shift key. Favonian (talk) 10:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.