Talk:Vegetable chip

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Vegetable chips/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 03:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

GA criteria

Well-written:

With the issues below addressed, the article now complies with MOS policies concerning grammar as well as general layout/structure. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 11:07, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article is very well-cited, and uses a sizable number of reputable sources. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 07:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article seems to cover all relevant aspects of its topic for which reliable information could be found. No cruft or anything unnecessary incorporated, either. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 07:23, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article's content remains consistently neutral throughout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 07:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Since as far back as last May, at least, there have been no disruptive fluctuations in the article content, by way of edit warring or otherwise. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

All images used in this article serve relevant illustrative purposes. All are accepted by the Wikimedia Commons, so there are no fair use-related concerns. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Comments

• Introduction: Isn't it redundant to say, "A variety of various root vegetables or..."?

• Rw to: "Many various root vegetables or leaf vegetables are used". North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

• Preparation and ingredients: Where "heart-healthy olive oil" is mentioned, does the olive oil need to be included in the quotations for any reason?

• I rewrote it to read: ""heart-healthy" olive oil", with quotes only around "heart-healthy". North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:14, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

• Brands and companies: Where it lists the Uprooted brand varieties, ie., Sweet potatoes and Sweet potatoes, beets and parsnips; has sweet potatoes been listed twice, or is the latter mentioning part of a combination? I can't access the source, and it's a little hard to tell as worded. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:04, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

• The first variety is just Sweet potatoes, and the second is Sweet potatoes, beets and parsnips. To clarify this, I rewrote it to read: "As of February 2016, Kettle Foods produces the Uprooted brand of vegetable chips in a Sweet potatoes variety and a Sweet potatoes, beets and parsnips variety." North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 11:04, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

The article now qualifies as GA - well worth the wait, I should hope. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 11:08, 10 April 2016 (UTC)