Talk:Vertico spatially modulated illumination

Low imp

See [1] for an explanations of the importance scale within the physics project.Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 10:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Exactly: "High: Important or famous. Something an undergraduate physics major could have heard of or studied" Please have a look what is going on in this field. There are only a few methods (microscopes) for the localisation of single molecules in a cell. All these methods are highly important for the biomolecular research. Using these types of microscopes scientists will be able to answer fundamental questions --88.79.241.157 (talk) 10:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

This is a type of microscope, not a field of physics covered in undergrad glasses. Microscope is high-imp. Types of microscopes are lower. This would be like rating Bee Hummingbirds to be similar importance than birds. In other words, there would be a serious gap in Wikipedia (or more specifically a gap in the the physics coverage) if there wasn't be an article on microscopes. The same cannot be said about Vertico SMI; there would be a gap, yes, but nothing crippling as far as the physics project is concerned. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 11:07, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

confusing article

Even as an expert I have trouble understanding what this technique is supposed to be about. It is all marketing speak "resolution up to" "fastest" etc. and no clear description how it works and what distinguishes it from similar ideas. Awfully written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.170.138.132 (talk) 09:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Amen, this confusing article needs help. Guys, run this article past a colleague or girlfriend in another field, answer their questions, and fix this article. I'm a member of the IEEE, the Optical Society of America -- this isn't my area, but walk me through it: the principle of operation (light at multiple axes in a rotating specimen, interference patterns, confocal optics, just say), show me how the principles are realized in practice (a diagram of a microscope, the optical path, anything), and compare to older technologies or issues that might be familiar to the reader. Don't worry about how neat it is, how much better it is, we all get that. Thanks, I've just gone in and fixed other articles myself when I can, but we in the community need your special knowledge and experience here.
Jerry-VA (talk) 03:21, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Vertico spatially modulated illumination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120109065512/http://idw-online.de:80/pages/de/news457531 to http://idw-online.de/pages/de/news457531

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)