Talk:2014 Veterans Health Administration controversy/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:Veterans Health Administration scandal of 2014/GA1)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Pine in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Peaceray (talk · contribs) 01:57, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article qualifies as a Good Article.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- I think that this article does a great job in describing the scandal in layman's terms. Much of the government source material was generated by wiktionary:policy wonk's, & this article summarized those works well.
To check for copyvios, I ran it through User:CorenSearchBot/manual. The result was that Veterans Health Administration scandal of 2014, as of 05:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC), did not appear to be a copyright violation.
- I think that this article does a great job in describing the scandal in layman's terms. Much of the government source material was generated by wiktionary:policy wonk's, & this article summarized those works well.
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- It is well-cited & uses over seven dozen sources without over-citation. During the course of my review, I was bold in assuring improving the consistency of the citations by putting them in citation formats, adding parameters, & the like. There are no broken links at this time.
- B. Citations to reliable sources:
- Links to a variety of news & government (executive & legislative) sources & at least one NGO source.
- C. No original research:
- Everything is drawn from the sources.
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- There are five images from Commons. Three are in the Public Domain; the remaining two are CC BY-SA 3.0.
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Well done!
- Pass or Fail:
- Thank you very much, Peaceray! --Pine✉ 07:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)