This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
It's been said before, but we absolutely cannot use Jay Robert Nash as the sole source for an article. Any statement which can only be sourced to Nash must be removed immediately. I'm giving you-who-watchlist-this-article a head's-up rather than deleting it outright, but get things done fast - like, 'next couple of days' fast. Got it? DS (talk) 02:38, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
I note this article has not been deleted, as hinted at above, and the page history shows no evidence of being proposed for deletion by DS in May 2011. Given the article's lack of specific citations for various statements, Nash's book probably has the status of Further reading as the book is not identified as a source any statements made in the article. The Manual of Style for an article's structure indicates that the appropriate heading for citations is "Notes and references" but, since the article doesn't have any citations, it is empty! Consequently, I have added some clean-up tags to highlight the fact that this article needs citations and that Nash is considered an unsuitable source. However, the article indicates there are a couple of other sources, so I have added these too. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 10:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
