Talk:Vineet Bhatia

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 173.231.59.123 in topic Contested deletion

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (this draft has now been tweaked to read as impartial. This has been cited correctly and no peacock terms have been used in this. There is no promotion in this, and it has been written in a formal tone.) --Ronbhat24 (talk) 22:37, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

To the Reviewing Administrator

edit

The fact that the submitter thinks that this is now neutrally written illustrates why conflict of interest editors cannot judge neutrality.

As a neutral reviewer, this draft is an edge case. It is not really purely promotional as specified for G11, but it does not belong in article space as written. If it could be draftified, then draftification would be appropriate. An Ignore All Rules G11 deletion would seem like the least undesirable action, since there is already a draft, because the submitter tried to game the system by creating it both in draft space and in article space. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:44, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --173.231.59.123 (talk) 03:10, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

It contains real facts about an internationally famous chef.