Talk:Von Kries coefficient law
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Von Kries coefficient law article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.png){kind=small}
Von Kries Who?
editShould there not be a link somewhere? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_von_Kries Da5nsy (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Typo?
edit"Therefore, if one of the three cones are less stimulated than the others, the sensitivity is proportionally reduced." This is unclear at best, and straight wrong at worst. Da5nsy (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Translation
editHaven't read it (yet) but I believe below is the location of a translation of Von Kries' work. Anyone able to confirm? Sources of Color Science - D MacAdam https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Sources_of_color_science.html?id=VihOAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y Da5nsy (talk) 15:43, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Not Current or most widely used
edit"...widely used law to quantify color adaptation" this is not true. The current standard is the Modified Bradford method. The CIE defines Bradford for transform into CIE L*a*b* as well as in CIECAM2000. The ICC specifies Bradford and as such it is the default method used in the CMMs of both Windows and Mac OS X. The brad ford method can be found here. http://www.brucelindbloom.com/index.html?Eqn_ChromAdapt.html Really this article should be renamed "Chromatic Adaption and the 3 major methods should be all in the same place Linear, Von Kries and Bradford. see the site above. --IlluminantD (talk) 17:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)