Talk:War Zone C
(Redirected from Talk:War zone C)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Mztourist in topic Recent Revert Discussion
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | On 13 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from War zone C to War Zone C. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 13 October 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
War zone C → War Zone C – The official wartime form of the name, and the one used always everywhere in every source. 5.173.41.12 (talk) 22:00, 13 October 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support. This does seem to be overwhelmingly capitalized, from the first few page of Google Scholar results and ngrams. Adumbrativus (talk) 04:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Recent Revert Discussion
editRegarding this
So, when I see notes and references, it doesn't seem consistent to me. Maybe I'm wrong. DarklitShadow (talk) 17:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- DarklitShadow What are you saying? The page is referenced. What is unreferenced that you believe needs to be fixed and which justifies the tag? You seem to tag a vast number of pages, but make little effort to fix the "problems" you have identified. That is Wikipedia:Tag bombing. Mztourist (talk) 03:06, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- When I see something with notes and references I get confused about lack of standardization. Is it correct (or incorrect) to have two separate source sections?
- DarklitShadow (talk) 19:42, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Its not how I would do it, but we are all bound by WP:CITEVAR. Just because you get confused doesn't mean it requires tagging, rather you should start a discussion on the relevant Talk Page. Mztourist (talk) 03:26, 29 December 2022 (UTC)