Talk:Welding helmet

Latest comment: 18 days ago by 174.94.28.189 in topic Wild rabbit hole

More information

edit

I'm trying to locate some more sources and material to turn this article into more than a stub, any help would be greatly appreciated. It survived an AfD based on the fact that it could be expanded into more... I think it's time to make that happen. I have some welding and engineering experiance, but anyone with some detailed knowledge or knowledge of sources would be greatly appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wintermut3 (talkcontribs) 19:07, December 5, 2006

MannGlas

edit

Just deleted this section. If you want it back, show some evidence that it is/was ever used or is somehow influential. Snori (talk) 05:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wild rabbit hole

edit

references OSHA Publication 3151, which is

references 29 CFR 1926.102(c)(1), which is at

but it doesn't... say... what the HELL the shade numbers actually mean or where they're defined. Guess that is a dead end.

Other attempts:

jp×g 06:51, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Found some more stuff poking around on the ANSI website:
  • BS EN 169:2002, Personal eye-protection. Filters for welding and related techniques. Transmittance requirements and recommended use
  • ISO-12311-2013, Personal protective equipment — Test methods for sunglasses and related eyewear


Got it. ANSI Z87.1-2003, appendix table 1, pp. 40. jp×g 07:19, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I removed the articles' table of shade numbers. Ctrl-F could not find "240" in any of those 7 links. I added a citation to the first, and noted that the shade number not only depends on current but also on type. 174.94.28.189 (talk) 08:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply