Talk:Stones Brewery
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stones Brewery article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Stones Brewery has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rewrite
editI have rewritten this page from a badly written stub to what it is now. I am to get it to Good Article Status eventually, but what is largely holding me back is source material. I would appreciate any help. Farrtj (talk) 22:22, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Stones Brewery/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: SilkTork (talk · contribs) 23:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Tick list
editGA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
First look
|
---|
Commentsedit
This is a useful, informative and well researched article and promises well for the nominator's plans to improve a series of beer articles. There are a number of issues arising as I read through, but nothing major, and I feel that the article will be able to be tidied up to meet GA criteria with just a little bit of work. I will finish the review later today. SilkTork ✔Tea time 12:28, 11 November 2011 (UTC) HoldeditArticles meets many of the GA criteria. The areas that need attention are listed above. The main concerns are:
I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days to allow work to be done. I will now be away in France for the Nice-Cannes Marathon with limited internet access, but I will look into this when I get back at the end of the month. SilkTork ✔Tea time 18:51, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
|
2nd look
editWiping the blackboard, and looking through again so it is clear what still needs attention, or if the article can now be listed. SilkTork ✔Tea time 16:34, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Pass
- Images.
- Stable.
- Reference section.
- Focus. Focus is OK now that Stones Bitter has been split. SilkTork ✔Tea time 17:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Original research.
- Major aspects.
- Sources. A lot of the sources are print, though these days many print sources are available online. It's worth doing a search to see if a print source is available online, as that is a great asset for readers and editors. I have found a couple and linked to them. They may be more to be found. SilkTork ✔Tea time 17:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Neutral. Sources confirm that what is said is accurate and neutral. SilkTork ✔Tea time 17:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Prose.
- moS.
- Fail
- Unclear
Pass
editThe lead could do with a bit of attention now that Stones Bitter has been split off. There is material there on the advertising that more properly belongs in the Stones Bitter lead. However, that's for ongoing development, the article is neat enough and informative enough to meet GA criteria. Listing. SilkTork ✔Tea time 17:37, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Query
editIs this article suppose to appear in the template at the bottom of its page?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Well noticed Tony. That was the result of the page move. I have now sorted the template. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:17, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Stones 1983.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Stones 1983.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:01, 18 November 2011 (UTC) |