This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
As the article points out, this William of Nassau was a bastard son of Maurice of Nassau, though recognized by his father (like a lot of his bastard half-brothers; Maurice was an easy-going fellow :-) and given a courtesy title. It is therefore better to use that courtesy title, especially as this is the name he is usually referred to by in historical works. It is a bit awkward to differentiate him from the many other Williams of Nassau by just his birth and death year. Unless one already knows those, this article is difficult to find. I propose therefore to change the title of the article accordingly, but I don't want to be overhasty. Maybe the person who wrote the article thought he had good reasons to choose this title?--Ereunetes (talk) 22:26, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Looking at the history of the article I noticed that it had been renamed from its original title"Willem van Nassau, heer van de Lek" in 2008. This seems also eminently reasonable, so maybe the title should simply revert to the original.--Ereunetes (talk) 21:11, 18 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
