Talk:Wolff v. District of Columbia

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wolff v. District of Columbia redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This redirect is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Did not make the article

Latest comment: 2 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

First total casualty of the project of making every SCOTUS article. As far as I can tell, nobody wrote about this case at the time, and it has only appeared in footnotes a smattering of times since. Basically DC put something in the sidewalk, this guy tripped, and he lost his leg. By my reading, the Court said DC has no special duty to light streets to prevent people from tripping over lawful road obstructions. lethargilistic (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic