Talk:Xilinx/Archives/2016

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


February 2010

What's the correct Wikipedia tag for 'an article that appeared to be written by the company and is full of marketing weasel-speak'? 203.14.156.195 (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

I agree with the above poster, this page reads as if it was written by Xilinx, and seems to ignore the historical and current competitive nature of the programmable device market. Dstanfor (talk) 14:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

I also agree. I designed equipment with Xilinx parts in the 1990s and up until 2003, and there seems to be a lot of talk about more recent Xilinx logic families, but no discussion of earlier logic families (which may no longer be available for sale). Extensive discussion of current product while ignoring the historical is one of the things that makes this sound more like a sales brochure. 76.254.24.27 (talk) 18:24, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Xilinx. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)