Talk:Year of three prime ministers

(Redirected from Talk:Year of Three Prime Ministers)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Favonian in topic Requested move 26 February 2023

Requested move 26 February 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Favonian (talk) 20:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


Year of Three Prime MinistersYear of three prime ministers - Per MOS:JOBTITLES, as "prime ministers" here is a description. Titles are written in sentence case, so "Three" becomes "three". Consistency with Year of three popes. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 19:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom Estar8806 (talk) 21:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Note that the linked other instances in the "See Also" section all have proper noun casing, with the popes being the exception.
>
BhamBoi (talk) 05:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but those are all (barring three kings) actual articles with content about a specific year. The popes and PMs are all WP:SETINDEXs, and as such, their article titles are descriptions. So, whilst "Year of the Three Emperors" is a legitimate title about a year that can be capitalised, "Year of three prime ministers" is not. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 13:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support: for the SETINDEX articles, the term is not being used with a specific referent and should not be capped (pretty much per JOBTITLES). The others are also questionable, since we would rely on consistent usage in sources. See ngram Year of the Three Emperors and ngram Year of the Four Emperors (ngram Year of four Emperors). The other years of n emperors don't give ngram results for the two variations. The Year of the Four Emperors is debatable/marginal since a clearer trend to cap is since about 2011 and could be ascribed to the Wiki article. Cinderella157 (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom --- Tbf69 P • T 14:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.