Talk:Young Engineers' Satellite 2

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Europe: ESA Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by ESA task force (assessed as High-importance).

NPOV

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article is not objective. It talks up the project as a success without keeping a neutral point of view. 188.192.112.162 (talk) 01:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Michiel Kruijff reply to the NPOV : the cited article in peer-reviewed Journal of Spacecraft & Rockets details the evidence that the scientific objectives were achieved, incl. a two-stage deployment demonstration, deployment reconstruction, capsule re-entry, tether properties determination, simulator validation and deployer performance validation. See also: http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid%3A9d437e58-82c0-4af1-935f-69ba5573c7a2/

I would thus suggest to remove the NPOV — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.169.141.54 (talk) 10:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic