Talk:Institute of Physics
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Institute of Physics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Both, internal and external links
editIn most of cases, when one searches for a scientific journal, the reader neads to download some specific paper. Wikipedia could provide short cut, not burdened with any adverticements. I would recover all the short cuts, giving both, external and internal links. The same applies also to the wiki articles about specific journals. dima 07:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- The convention that has developed appears to be to list the internal and external links in, for example, List of scientific journals in physics. Articles on a particular journal of course have an external link, generally on the infobox which all journal articles should have. However articles on the publisher, such as the Institute of Physics, should only have the internal link. An external link there is likely to be seen as spam. --Bduke 10:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Merge here of PhysicsWeb
editUser:B. Wolterding has proposed that this stub be merged into the appropriate section of this article. Please debate it here.
- Support. Agree, it is only ever going to be a stub and it is best to have it here in the main article for the Institute. --Bduke 22:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- The text has been merged. --B. Wolterding 10:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
References
editThis article is completely unreferenced although some of the external links may support some of the material, but that needs to be addressed properly. I have tagged it accordingly. In particular, where does the recently added section on history after the merge of the two previous associations come from? The IOP History web page only goes up to the date of the merge in 1960. --Bduke (talk) 23:51, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
IOP Publishing section
editThis edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
There are a couple of community websites listed that IOP Publishing no longer publishes: "compoundsemiconductor.net - Contains news, articles from Compound Semiconductors and a Buyer's Guide. A resource for the compound semiconductor community." and "fibers.org - news, analysis, buyers guide and recruitment service for optical networking community." (Ref: http://ioppublishing.org/publications/websites) Please can these be deleted? Thank you, Physics114 (talk) 16:39, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
- I checked compoundsemiconductor.net and fibers.org and noted that they say they have new publishers now, so I implemented this edit for you. Thanks for the tip! Dreamyshade (talk) 04:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Institute of Physics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141113120514/http://ioppublishing.org/aboutUsDetails to http://ioppublishing.org/aboutUsDetails
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150216004556/http://www.stimulatingphysics.org/index.htm to http://www.stimulatingphysics.org/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)