Talk:Zubr-class LCAC

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 101.127.42.241 in topic Deployment.

Untitled

edit

Hello,
Problem with Specifications, Performances: If speed=60 kts and range=300 Nautics, then endurance=5 Hours, and no 5 days !

--Frogs Eater, David 00:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Information in infobox

edit

All information in the infobox was taken from the article text or the external links. If there are mistakes, feel free to fix them. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:29, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not first Soviet ship in NATO

edit

"The transfer of the Kefalonia (L- 180), the first of two Zubr hovercraft purchased by the Greeks, to the Hellenic Navy marked the first time that a Russian-made ship was used by the navy of a NATO member."

If 2001 date of comissioning is right, then this statement is wrong. In 1999 Poland joined NATO, and Polish Navy at the time operated ORP Warszawa - Kashin class destroyer, two Foxtrot class submarines, Kilo class submarines, four Tarantul class corvettes, along with smaller craft. Though it was the first Russian-made ship delivered to NATO member, as Polish Navy received it's ships either as Warsaw Pact member, or early in the 90's.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.5.160.10 (talk) 12:58, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

It should probably be "...first time that a Russian-made ship was purchased by the navy of a NATO member." /83.227.130.26 (talk) 16:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Software error

edit

{{geodata-check}}

The co-ordinates for this reference are fine. I added them myself. The problem instead is with the software. When you select to find the location in Google Earth, which is what I'd like the reader to do, instead of taking one to the place corresponding to the co-ordinates I've given, you are taken to the "nearest place of interest", already featured in Google Maps, instead. This can be far far away from the earth co-ordinates the editor has given, in this instance approx 9km. At least when this happens in Google Maps instead the nearest place marker (in Red)(accompanied by a question 'did you mean this place instead?') is accompanied by a further place marker (in Green) which also shows the actual location of the earth co-ordinates entered for the search. However, when this happens in Google Earth (satellite view) instead one is merely taken to the (Google Maps) nearest existing place of interest, without any information as to why one is not looking at the earth co-ordinates searched for instead ? I cannot be the first person to point out this anomaly ?


John Eight Thirty-two (talk) 10:07, 26 June 2011 (UTC) John Eight Thirty-two (talk) 10:07, 26 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

This is a known problem that resides with Google, not with Wikipedia. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:41, 15 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Craft surprises beachgoers

edit

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-23793498 - footage of Russia's Mordovia (782) in motion. Merlin83b (talk) 16:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

the range number is incorr.....of no correctness

edit

According to the German page, it is 300 nautical miles it has in range. 300 nm is knot the same thing as 480 kilomtres. Could someone just change it? --85.164.221.168 (talk) 21:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Deployment.

edit

Do Zubr Class LCAC get deployed from a warship, or from a boatyard? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.162.2.140 (talk) 08:29, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

it operates independently from 1 coastline to another coastline. there are no military ship that are large enought to transport it, but it is possible to use civilian transport to carry it 101.127.42.241 (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/zubr/
    Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 21:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zubr-class LCAC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:23, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply