- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Moswento talky 22:02, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Acércate
edit- Reviewed: Barkley 2
5x expanded by DivaKnockouts (talk). Self nom at 05:15, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but it does not appear to me by any measure that this article was sufficiently expanded within the five-day period. Daniel Case (talk) 17:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, you're right. Sorry, I forgot to to make sure it was sufficiently expanded within the time period. Thank you. — DivaKnockouts (talk) 17:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC)