- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 09:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Blue cotinga, Lovely cotinga
edit( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
Lovely cotinga. Lithograph by Joseph Wolf
... that the female lovely cotinga (pictured with males) and blue cotinga are not blue?
- ALT1:... that male lovely cotinga (pictured) and blue cotinga are quite different in appearance to the females?
- Reviewed: Jimmy Whitehouse
- Comment: Also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Beaver Run (Buffalo Creek)
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:04, 28 August 2015 (UTC).
Neutral, age and length for the blue are fine; no evil text sinning (always difficult to avoid duplication of terminology, but where possible it is done); QPQs done; picture free to use and pretty; the prep builder that doesn't use it would be a fool; the original hook is a bit confusing (we wouldn't necessarily expect the lovely cotinga to be blue; if it wasn't lovely we'd be in business), so the ALT is preferred (even though sexual dimorphism isn't uncommon). Unfortunately (as far as I can see) the lovely cotinga article is nowhere near 5x expanded, so you either need to drop that (don't do that because we'll lose the lush pic) or expand it some more (it needs to be 2080 characters according to DYK Check's calcs). Belle (talk) 01:00, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- You are quite right, the second article was insufficiently expanded. I have added some more information and it should (just) be OK now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
