- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 08:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Bulkboek
- ... that Bulkboeken ("bulk books") were cheap reprints (on newsprint) of Dutch literary classics, published from 1971 to the late 1990s, and again from 2007 on? Source: https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/_tie002201101_01/_tie002201101_01_0020.php?q=Knippenberg%20bulkboek#528
Created by Drmies (talk). Self-nominated at 04:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC).
Interesting program on fine sources, Dutch sources accepted AGF. I have a few questions about the proposed hook. It reads as if it were books, but turning to the article, it's an organisation. I'd open the brackets for newsprints. I don't know which tense to use because while the 1971 batch is past, the 2007 is ongoing. The lead intro is past, - sort of correct because it seems a different organisation that does the 2007, no? The more foreign and ambiguous a title, the more I miss an infobox, but do as you please. Any help with the hook wording? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Reviewing this afresh to keep things moving. Timely nomination, long enough, neutral, and well referenced, with QPQ provided. I don't share Gerda's concerns about the ambiguity of the hook referring to "Bulkboeken" as books when the subject of the article is the Bulkboek company that produced them; it appears that the products got their name from the company name and were referred to as such. AGF for hook verification and close paraphrasing from the Dutch-language sources. 97198 (talk) 22:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
