Overall: Toadboy123, the article is solid and well-sourced. The hook is interesting, and the source from The Guardian supports it. Earwig shows a 37.1% similarity to the source, which I believe is due to the direct quotations from the What's on Weibo review, so it should not be a concern. One thing I would like to nitpick is that it is better to avoid citing Weibo, as it is a social media platform. While I understand that the articles you cited are from the accounts of media outlets, it would be more ideal to cite the original articles directly rather than their reposts on social media. For instance, source 2 could be replaced with this url to Sohu Entertainment[1]. But this is not a critical issue that would prevent the article from moving forward. Spotchecked sources 2 and 9 and found no issues. Two QPQs done. Good to go! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 15:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
I have fixed the source which you have stated. Toadboy123 (talk) 02:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Toadboy123, the article is solid and well-sourced. The hook is interesting, and the source from The Guardian supports it. Earwig shows a 37.1% similarity to the source, which I believe is due to the direct quotations from the What's on Weibo review, so it should not be a concern. One thing I would like to nitpick is that it is better to avoid citing Weibo, as it is a social media platform. While I understand that the articles you cited are from the accounts of media outlets, it would be more ideal to cite the original articles directly rather than their reposts on social media. For instance, source 2 could be replaced with this url to Sohu Entertainment[1]. But this is not a critical issue that would prevent the article from moving forward. Spotchecked sources 2 and 9 and found no issues. Two QPQs done. Good to go! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 15:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)