- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:08, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Highland Branch
edit- ... that locomotives completed a circuit on the Boston and Albany Railroad's Highland Branch? Source: American Railroad Journal, 1882
- Reviewed: 1995 Williamsburg Bridge collision
Converted from a redirect by Mackensen (talk). Self-nominated at 12:46, 9 June 2018 (UTC).
Interesting, on good sources, offline source accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. - Please fix error messages: refs O'Connell and Poor (1894) are not (yet?) used. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Thanks for the review! Those sources were used in a previous iteration, but I found other sources which replaced them. I've tidied it up. Mackensen (talk) 14:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but I just don't see what's hooky about it. Yoninah (talk) 23:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's a minor play on words, but backed by the original description of the line in nineteenth century sources when electricity was still a relatively new thing. An electrical circuit is a network consisting of a closed loop, giving a return path for the current. The completion of this line allowed locomotives to travel in a loop, completing the circuit. That's all. Mackensen (talk) 01:51, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Mackensen: Oh. But since it's not readily understandable, no one's going to click on it. Yoninah (talk) 10:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- I understood right away that having a circuit is different from the normal one line, with trains going back and forth. - It's what we have for a bus line here, and I like it for its fairness. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:40, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think there's anything obscure about the hook. Mackensen (talk) 12:39, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Thanks for the review! Those sources were used in a previous iteration, but I found other sources which replaced them. I've tidied it up. Mackensen (talk) 14:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
