Template:Did you know nominations/Kingston Lacy

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Fram (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Kingston Lacy

edit
Kingston Lacy
Kingston Lacy

Improved to Good Article status by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 05:34, 3 September 2016 (UTC).

  • This article was passed as good article on 28 August. A large expansion of the article began on 24 August taking main text from 1480 words to 2151 words Now long enough, with content that is written in a neutral style and that is well-referenced with inline citations to a selection of reliable sources. The article appears free of close paraphrasing or copyright violations although I note one major source is not available online, so this is accepted in good faith. I tweaked the National Trust link in the hook. Aside from that, the hook is short, interesting and properly constructed. The hook is verified within the article by an online source. The image is in the article, does work at the small DYK image size; it was uploaded in 2003 and has an appropriate license. QPQ has been met. Good to go. Drchriswilliams (talk) 07:17, 3 September 2016 (UTC)