- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:36, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nesta Wells
... that Nesta Wells was the first British female police surgeon?Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)- ALT1:... that Nesta Wells, the first British woman police surgeon, published a survey in the British Medical Journal of the 1,959 suspected sexual offence cases to which she had been referred? Source: The BMJ article, the pg 1404-1405 and D'Cruze book reference
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Earl Landgrebe
- Comment: I welcome hook suggestions
Created by Cowlibob (talk). Self-nominated at 14:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC).
Hi Cowlibob, review follows: article created 18 December; article exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I didn't notice any overly close paraphrasing from the sources; hook is interested, mentioned in the article and backed up by the ODNB source. Once a QPQ is provided this one should be good to go - Dumelow (talk) 15:57, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Dumelow: Thanks for your review, I've added a QPQ above. Cowlibob (talk) 16:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
All good - Dumelow (talk) 17:05, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
@Cowlibob: Hi, could you suggest something other than a "first woman" hook? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 01:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Certainly, I'll work something up and let you know.Cowlibob (talk) 10:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: ALT1 above, feel free to suggest amendments. The table shows 1,959 (after discounting crossover), the book reference has seemingly rounded this to 2000. Cowlibob (talk) 11:45, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Dumelow: Thanks for your review, I've added a QPQ above. Cowlibob (talk) 16:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
