The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Yonne

edit

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 05:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC).

  • The article is newly expanded.
  • The article has not previously featured on the Main Page.
  • The article is long enough.
  • Citations are sufficient and drawn from reliable published sources.
  • No disputes surround the article.
  • I see nothing that might be construed as a BLP violation.
  • I can find no particular issues with plagiarism. I assume the wording is original.
  • I see no neutrality issues, either. This is a straightforward account.
  • The article is not up for AfD.
  • I assume good faith as to the hook. I do have to note that there is much to dislike in the article as it stands: "from Socialist Party (France)" should be "from the Socialist Party", while the author really should decide on a valid citation format. "J. Robinson (ed) "The Oxford Companion to Wine" Third Edition pg 148–149 Oxford University Press 2006 ISBN 0-19-860990-6" is gibberish; if you are to use "cite book", at least use it consistently; ergo, Robinson, J., ed. (2006). The Oxford Companion to Wine. Oxford University Press. p. 148-49. ISBN 0-19-860990-6. But yes, the hook does pass, as far as that's concerned. - Biruitorul Talk 23:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)