"Wikipedia:Requests for creation" listed at Redirects for discussion

  The redirect Wikipedia:Requests for creation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 14 § Wikipedia:Requests for creation until a consensus is reached. Awesome Aasim 18:11, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Article wizard should not overwrite existing drafts

From this diff, it appears the article wizard sometimes overwrites existing drafts. Does this wizard have a maintainer that can look into this possible bug? I think if the article wizard overwrites existing drafts some or all of the time, this is undesirable behavior and should probably be fixed. Thanks. –Novem Linguae (talk) 19:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed change to first page of the wizard

Suggested edit to first page, implemented at User:Gryllida/NewArticleBLPv1/preload/wizpage, to encourage new users to author tiny submissions which can be easier to review and reduce the backlog. Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 00:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Related discussion: link. -- Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 00:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Related discussion: link. (bump/follow up with link to this section). -- Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 00:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Seems backwards to me. The purpose of AfC is to help people create articles. This is saying article creators have to help people review them. If you find a draft too long to review, then don't review it. Neither of the above linked discussions appear to show consensus for this change. – Joe (talk) 06:49, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. In re-reading the past discussion, there was a reasonable consensus against making any sort of mandatory maximum length of a draft. Primefac (talk) 12:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply