Template talk:Animation industry in the United States
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Including Fox within Disney
edit@DragonKing22: Regarding this revert, I do not see any reason why Fox properties should be included within Disney at this time. The two companies are legally separate and will remain so until all necessary regulatory approvals have been secured and the merger is completed, which will not happen until next year. Until then, the two are legally separate and operate separately. Can you explain why you think differently? Aoi (青い) (talk) 01:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Size of this navbox
editI'd like to quote from Wikipedia:Navigation template, specifically the section Navigation templates provide navigation within Wikipedia:
- The goal is not to cram as many related articles as possible into one space. Ask yourself, does this help the reader in reading up on related topics? Take any two articles in the template. Would a reader really want to go from A to B?
- They should be kept small in size as a large template has limited navigation value.
This template has drifted from that and is overwhelmed by listing every American animation studio. I propose replacing the large list of studios with a link to List of animation studios, and making this a small navigable template, like this:
The companies and studios on the navbox are disappeared.
editWhen I was in the wikipedia page to research about the animation studios but right now when I check on the companies and studios in the navbox, it was gone, I have no idea about what's going on. It must be a sort of mistake or something. Can you also explain about this situation about the disappearance mistake?
