Template talk:ArbComBlock

(Redirected from Template talk:ArbComBlock/testcases)
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Three Sixty in topic Edit request 6 November 2023

Edit request on 14 August 2012

edit

Perhaps the "in writing" bit should be removed? All appeals will obviously be made in writing, rather than, say, in the form of a YouTube video, so it seems rather redundant to include this. 85.117.21.156 (talk) 13:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit protected}} template. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
  Partly done: [1]. However, this is otherwise fine as it is. AGK [•] 16:57, 27 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Edit request on 7 January 2013

edit

Can an admin change the e-mail address part? arbcom-appeals-en lists.wikimedia.org is the mailing list for appeals by blocked or banned users. Thanks Hto9950 (talk | contribs) 15:46, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  DoneMr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 18:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
I reverted this edit. ArbCom blocks are made by the committee, and appeals of them are therefore never heard by the subcommittee. See also my edit in September 2012. AGK [•] 12:34, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Well, we'll wait and see if someone that has the template placed on their talk page see if they appeal a block to ArbCom. For the moment, it is 50/50. Hto9950 17:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Edit request on 6 December 2014

edit

May I suggest replacing the word "outwith" with the word "beyond".--KTo288 (talk) 13:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Template-protected edit request on 21 February 2017

edit

Please wrap the admin instructions in <span class="sysop-show">...</span> to hide them from non-admins Pppery 21:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Done The horizontal rule remains. — Train2104 (t • c) 22:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Width

edit

@AGK: Re. your revert: {{Banned user}}, and {{Sockpuppeteer}} for example. – Joe (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for missing your message! I was thinking of {{checkuserblock}} and all the templates listed at Template:Uw-block/doc/Block templates. And I suppose we are better using all the available space…? Not massively fussed if you want the template to be narrower. AGK ■ 19:42, 21 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Template-protected edit request on 24 June 2023

edit

Change

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked you should review the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] then appeal by [[Special:Emailuser/Arbitration Committee|emailing the Arbitration Committee]] (direct address: ''{{Nospam|arbcom-en|wikimedia.org}})''.

to

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then appeal by [[Special:Emailuser/Arbitration Committee|emailing the Arbitration Committee]] (direct address: ''{{Nospam|arbcom-en|wikimedia.org}})''.

Reason: Proper grammar OutsideNormality (talk) 17:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 21:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit request 6 November 2023

edit

Description of suggested change: add {{pp-semi-indef}} on the /doc subpage

Diff:

+
{{pp-semi-indef}}

172.96.162.98 (talk) 03:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

This would not do anything, furthermore please see the WP:Protection policy. CMD (talk) 05:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Done; the page is indefinitely semi-protected, so adding the template is fine. ⟲ Three Sixty! Talk? Work. 18:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply