Template talk:CC0

Can I find a version of this that does not use any templates and only uses wiki text? Alphaslucas ^talk 09:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

What does the exact HTML look like that needs to be used in order to add the tag, i.e. <, > / ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdelaideEldridge (talk • contribs) 05:48, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 21 March 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 19:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

---

• Template:Cc-zero → Template:CC0
• Template:CC-0 Release → Template:CC0 Release.

– Reason: The name of the license is "CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication".[1]

The following pages currently redirect to Template:Cc-zero.

• Template:CC-0
• Template:Cc-0
• Template:CC-Zero
• Template:Cc-Zero
• Template:CC0
• Template:Cc0

I propose making them all redirect to Template:CC0

I further propose creating the following redirects:

• Template:CC0 1.0 to Template:CC0
• Template:CC-O to Template:CC0
• Template:Cc-o to Template:CC0
• Template:CCO to Template:CC0
• Template:Cco to Template:CC0
  

-- Guy Macon (talk) 17:29, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

• Support - I don't see a reason why not. Is there some technical reason why lots of old templates have such clunky names? Daß Wölf 19:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
• Support – Creative Commons refer to the license as "CC0", not "CC-0" or "CC-Zero". Jean ^(t·c) 17:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Only use on file pages?

With data now being hosted on Wikipedia, this template should be edited to remove/alter the notice to only use on file pages, right? ɱ (talk) 03:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 16 May 2021

Please change <span class="licensetpl_link_req" style="display:none;">true</span> to <span class="licensetpl_link_req" style="display:none;">false</span>, identifying the license is not required when reusing a CC0 image. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 01:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:36, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 17 May 2021

I've noticed the license metadata link is broken, please update from the sandbox. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 23:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 3 June 2024

Shouldn't the "his or her" part just say "their"? AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 16:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

I think "his or her" is perfectly correct in this context — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

That text does not live in this template. See MediaWiki talk:Wm-license-cc-zero-explanation, where the original "their" was changed to "his or her". "Their" would be more inclusive of non-binary people and non-individual creators such as organizations and groups, so it would probably be a useful change. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

And not only that but the same template in Commons also just uses their instead of his or her. AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 22:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)