Template talk:ISO standards
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
I changed the numbering
editThe template was grouped by
- 1-9k
- 10k-20k
- 20k-
but I changed it to say
- 1 to 9999
- 10000 to 19999
- 20000+
It looks a little uglier but it is more correct. Jason Quinn (talk) 20:13, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- There may be some merit in splitting the numbers up the same was as in the List of International Organization for Standardization standards article, for the sake of consistency, ie:
- 1-999
- 1000-9999
- 10000-19999
- 20000-29999
- 30000-39999
- 40000+ (This doesn't match the article, which only has 80000)
Adding ISO 21500 Guidance for Project Management
editI am writing several articles on project management as part of the ASCE Body of Knowledge project ( or ASCE BoK) as well as the Project Management Institute Body of Knowledge project ( or PM BoK). ISO cites and parallels a lot of the materials.... Thanks ...
Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2019
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Include ISO 26262 Standard in the list (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_26262) Cynosure1 (talk) 23:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- ย Done โ Jonesey95 (talk) 07:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can we get 14496-10 updated for WP:BRINT? The article seems to have been renamed. It should link directly to Advanced Video Coding (avoiding the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC redirect). Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Versatile Video Coding as 23090-3
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can we get 23090-3 added? It should link to Versatile Video Coding. This can be seen at MPEG-I โ MPEG. Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- The page you linked does not mention the standard, so I don't know if this should be done yet. ๐๐ค๐ฏ๐บ๐ช๐ค๐๐๐ท๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐บ๐ด๐๐๐ฐ (๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ ) 22:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- @1234qwer1234qwer4: Well if you won't take that one how about this one which certainly means it is published ("Stage: 60.00 (Under publication)" as of 2021-01-20): https://www.iso.org/standard/73022.html 50.53.23.14 (talk) 22:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- ย Done ๐๐ค๐ฏ๐บ๐ช๐ค๐๐๐ท๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐บ๐ด๐๐๐ฐ (๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ ) 12:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)