Template talk:Infobox F1 team

(Redirected from Template talk:Infobox former F1 team)
Latest comment: 5 months ago by 5225C in topic Test drivers vs reserve drivers

Short name

edit

Is the "short name" truly necessary? Either the logo says it, or the article should say it. Dan | Talk 21:12, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Is "Tyres" needed any more?

edit

since all teams use bridgestone tyres now, is there any need for the tyres section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.162.197 (talk) 14:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

2008/2009 distinction

edit

Showing the 2008 information is entirely unnecessary, I propose that we remove it. Eightball (talk) 16:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've raised the matter at WP:F1 for wider visibility. DH85868993 (talk) 22:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Recent changes

edit

Personally, I would prefer to retain the shaded background for the "2009 Formula One season" and "Formula One World Championship Career" headings, for consistency with Template:Infobox former F1 team. DH85868993 (talk) 09:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Trivial to do, if there's consensus. Just need to add a value for headerstyle, as with the other infobox. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
I agree; I think it looks better with the shaded headings.--Midgrid(talk) 15:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Entering the website in the table

edit

I am going to enter the website in the table. Wild mine (talk) 12:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Parent company

edit

What would people think about the entering of a parent company field in the template? It would only show if there was actaully a parent company, which there is for most teams:

Team - Parent Company

- mspete93 [talk] 17:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Website field

edit

Any thoughts about having a field for the team's official website url somewhere on this infobox - at the bottom of the top section perhaps? -- de Facto (talk). 08:52, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Boldly did it. -- de Facto (talk). 08:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Test drivers vs reserve drivers

edit

With the decline of testing, and with it the reduction in test drivers (and the relevancy of the ones that remain), is there any objection to renaming the "test driver" field to "reserve driver"? 5225C (talk • contributions) 11:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply