Template talk:Infobox parliamentary group

Reordering and Renaming Parametres

@Number 57, Impru20, Julius Schwarz, Vacant0, HapHaxion, Checco, Braganza, Helper201, PLATEL, Nick.mon, Autospark, and Scia Della Cometa: I believe the order and naming of parametres could be improved. This is the order I think makes better sense:

Other name(s) {{{other_names}}}
Chamber {{{chamber}}}
Legislature(s) {{{legislature}}}
Foundation {{{foundation}}}
Dissolution {{{dissolution}}}
Leader {{{leader}}}
President {{{president}}}
Constituency {{{constituency}}}
Vice presidents {{{vice_presidents}}}
Spokesperson {{{spokesperson}}}
General secretary {{{general_secretary}}}
Treasurer {{{treasurer}}}
Political position {{{position}}}
Member parties {{{parties}}}
Ideology {{{ideology}}}
Representation {{{members}}}
Website	{{{website}}}

That doesn't mean that my suggestion is the only one, as others can suggest too, but I feel this order is more logical, and is more in line with TIPP. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 13:49, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

maybe add {{{status}}}, in germany there is a difference between groups (less rights, rn there are two: Linke & BSW), factions (SPD, AfD, CDU/CSU ect.), "parliamentary groups" (interfactional groups like "Parliamentary Group Railroad traffic") and SPD also has groups (Parlamentarische Linke, Netzwerk Berlin, Seeheimer Kreis – i am not sure about their legal status to be honest)

similar with UK (caucus like Socialist Campaign Group vs. party like Parliamentary Labour Party) and US (main party caucus like House Republican Conference & internal caucus like Freedom Caucus)

Italy has "components" within the mixed group, i think if it would be useful to have parameters for this Braganza (talk) 17:12, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

The only imput I can give is that, as long as position is included (I would abolish it because it is quite contentious), it should be named simply "position", not "political position", consistently with "ideology". --Checco (talk) 13:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)