Template talk:Infobox reality competition season

(Redirected from Template talk:Infobox reality competition season/doc)
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Favre1fan93 in topic Runner-ups

No. of teams

edit

@Gonnym: what do you think of adding another alternative to number of contestants that would be number of teams for television series where the contestants compete and win as teams? The thought came up when I was considering on creating a season article for The Great Food Truck Race. TheDoctorWho (talk) 00:36, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Runner-ups

edit

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the plural form of runner-up is runners-up and not runner-ups, yes? Wani (talk) 22:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Wani: I've fixed this and the general pluralization code in the module. The parameter |runner-ups= still exists, so if it feels that needs to be changed, we'd have to probably get a bot involved. Though with the new pluralization code, I don't think that, |winners=, or |companion_shows= is needed any more. Gonnym care to add any thoughts about this? I think my assessment is correct. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I agree and was thinking the same thing. The pluralize code is a much more modern approach to this and makes the parameter usage much more consistent. The next step (in my opinion) would be to add the deprecation code so the plural parameters can eventually be removed. Gonnym (talk) 08:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. I think we can implement that and start this process. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Just discovered thanks to multiple edits from Gonnym that if there are multiple runners-up, and the parameter is changed from “runner-ups” to “runner-up” it completely removes that info from the infobox. - SanAnMan (talk) 18:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@SanAnMan: |runner-ups= is depreciated (as are the other former plural parameters) and shouldn't be used any more. The term will pluralize if more than one name is added. It should be fixed where you saw the issue to the non-plural version. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Favre1fan93: Thank you for fixing it, the term wasn’t working before with more than one name but it is now. - SanAnMan (talk) 19:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
No problem. You may have seen the page in a weird in-between state of the template after the old plural parameters were removed and the site not having yet purged its cache. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply