Talk:Isotopes of silicon

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of silicon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Isotopes of silicon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070711094750/http://ie.lbl.gov/education/parent/Si_iso.htm to http://ie.lbl.gov/education/parent/Si_iso.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Just a question

Hi, I was wondering why the article begins by saying, "Silicon (14Si) has 14 known isotopes, with mass numbers ranging from 22 to 36," but then the paragraphs ends by talking about 43Si, and the table below lists more than 14 isotopes, many with mass numbers >36. Are these isotopes somehow "not known"? Thanks. 198.16.243.131 (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Was vandalism, reverted. Thank you! Double sharp (talk) 06:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Details on specific isotopes

I added the section on ²⁹Si in an effort to draw attention to the related phenomenon of A-centers, in addition to the info already in the main Si article. My bad for the misinterpretation (and also the mistakes on notation). It was of interest to me because A-center is currently an orphan, though at this point I'm having difficulty finding anywhere else it would make sense to mention. It probably needs someone with a background in the field.

Does anyone know of other relevant information about the isotopes of Silicon that go beyond just listing them? It seems like isotopes of tin is in a similar situation. Reconrabbit (talk|edits) 13:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

The source you cited did not support the claims. I'd suggest linking directly from new content in Crystallographic defect.

As for other isotopes, you can probably look through Google Scholar. Silicon-28 was used in pure form in the Avogadro project. You may be surprised by the amount of coverage on some specific radioisotopes, such as ³⁴Si. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll do that and find some sources on the isotopes. I will leave the crystallographic details to an expert - my knowledge only goes as far as knowing the different unit cell types. Reconrabbit (talk|edits) 05:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)