Template talk:Maybe free media
 | Template:Maybe free media is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
 | This template was considered for deletion on 27 January 2013. The result of the discussion was "withdrawn". |
Template-protected edit request on 20 June 2023
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I request the following edits to this template:
1: Replace the short description at the bottom of the template's page with the documentation template;
2: Fix minor grammatical errors that appear when the "commons" parameter is set to "no" (see the third test case in Template:Maybe_free_media/testcases) and change the capitalization of the word "Non-free" to "non-free";
3: Add external links to relevant copyright policies and Wikimedia Commons; and
4: Remove an extra-wide paragraph break when additional rationale isn't provided (see the first test case in Template:Maybe_free_media/testcases).
This template's sandbox contains all the edits that I am requesting. Alpha514 (talk) 02:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 03:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 26 August 2023
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove
If the image has no source, add
{{subst:nsd}}
It really doesn't have anything to do with the subject of this template in my opinion. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 00:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure I understand, editor QuickQuokka – the subject of this template is that an editor thinks a particular image could be "free", or in other words, not "non-free". If the image has a source, then its copyright status is easier to determine, correct? So why would it not be pertinent to apply {{subst:nsd}} if the image isn't sourced? P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 14:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Paine Ellsworth: Ohhh, that makes sense. I will now close this request.
Not done QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 07:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Thank you very much! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 23:23, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
