Template talk:Navbox track gauge

(Redirected from Template talk:Navbox track gauge/doc)
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Voice of Clam in topic Why

Please correct

edit

Template:RailGauge

  • 1668 is really (5 ft 523 in)

Peter Horn 22:22, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • 3000 or 3,000 mm (9 ft 10+18 in) is really (9 ft 1018 in)

121.102.47.39 (talk) 12:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • 3000 or 3,000 mm (9 ft 10+18 in) is really 3,000 mm (9 ft 1018 in)

121.102.47.39 (talk) 02:26, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • 1980 is really 1,980 mm (6 ft 51920 in)
  • 1981 is really 1,981 mm (6 ft 6 in)
  • 6 ft 6 in (1,981 mm) is really 6 ft 6 in (1,981 mm)

220.210.143.190 (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • 10 ft (3,048 mm) or 9ft10.11in is really 9 ft 1018 in (3,000 mm)

220.210.143.190 (talk) 13:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:52, 2 December 2011 (UTC)Reply



Template:Rail gaugesTemplate:Track gauge – Per Talk:Track_gauge#Requested_move. HTML2011 (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Why does it not work?

edit

Why does Imperial work i.e. lead to "Summary" and Imperial not work i.e. not lead to "imperial (762 mm/2 ft 6 in)"? Peter Horn User talk 01:59, 14 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Imperial does work. Peter Horn User talk 18:41, 14 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Imperial should have read Imperial. Peter Horn User talk 05:15, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

2' isn't minimum gauge

edit

2' and 600mm are generally considered to be narrow gauge. 18" to 10¼" are considered, and referenceable via Heywood, as minimum gauge,but not above this. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:08, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Bosnian gauge

edit

Bosnian gauge compare 760 and 760 mm (2 ft 5.92 in). It should perhaps be 2 ft 51516 in. Peter Horn User talk 05:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Limiting the list?

edit

Currently, Peter Horn is adding more gauges to this box [1]. Now the whole #List_of_defined_track_gauges has 248 entries. Would it be really helpful if all these are listed here? So far, I don't see much ov er view in a long list of lengthes. Could we find cut-off criteria? -DePiep (talk) 16:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Why

edit

Why does the latest revision 1,945 mm (6 ft 4+916 in) not show where ever this template is used in any article? Peter Horn User talk 01:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC) Peter Horn User talk 01:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

You may need to purge the page transcluding the template, or wait for the software to catch up (usually a few hours). It seems to be working in (for example) Dual gauge. Voice of Clam (talk) 06:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
However looking at your addition, it only points to a specific locomotive - I don't see the need for this unless there's a corresponding Dutch broad gauge article, in which case the template should link to that instead. Voice of Clam (talk) 06:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply