Template talk:R from CamelCase
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | Template:R from CamelCase is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
 | This template (Template:R from CamelCase) was considered for deletion on August 2005. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
 | Note: Any changes made to this template's content needs to be checked as workable in the tables on the references which include it directly: |
{{editprotected}}
Please is there a reason for enclosing linked CamelCase between <noinclude> tags? I think that this causes the word to appear unlinked in this list: Wikipedia:Template messages/Redirect pages#A to D. I consider the link to be important because I did not know what CamelCase is. I propose to change
This is a redirect from a <noinclude>[[CamelCase]][[Category:All redirect templates]]</noinclude><includeonly>CamelCase</includeonly> title. In the initial versions of Wikipedia, all links had to be CamelCase.
to
This is a redirect from a [[CamelCase]] title. In the initial versions of Wikipedia, all links had to be CamelCase. <noinclude>[[Category:All redirect templates]]</noinclude> pabouk (talk) 10:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- I can see no reason for this either.
Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Main namespace only
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Since the Printworthy and Unprintworthy categories are to be populated by Main namespace redirects, a small modification to this Rcat will get the several redirects from other namespaces out of those categories. Please make the following change:
- From this...
[[Category:Unprintworthy redirects]]
- to this...
{{Main other|[[Category:Unprintworthy redirects]]}}
That will ensure that the Unprintworthy category will be populated only my Main namespace redirects that are tagged with the {{R from CamelCase}} Rcat. Thank you! – PIE ( CLIMAX ) 22:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Done Anomie⚔ 17:27, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Again, thank you very much, Anomie! – PIE ( CLIMAX ) 23:41, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Edit needed
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There now exists an {{R from subpage}} template that redirects to Template:R with old history, so it is confusing to use "subpages" in this Rcat. Please modify the first sentence as follows:
- from this...
This is a redirect from a [[w:CamelCase|CamelCase]] or [[Wikipedia:Subpages|subpage]] title.
- to this...
This is a redirect from a [[w:CamelCase|CamelCase]] title.
Thank you in advance! – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 09:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- Done --Redrose64 (talk) 21:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you again! – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 00:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Redirect § {{R with old history}} - cutoff date. All the best, user:A smart kittenmeow 09:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)