Template talk:R from monotypic taxon
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Template:R from monotypic taxon is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
Switch to use Lua module
editI have written a Lua module Module:Science redirect, which can serve as a back-end for {{R from alternative scientific name}}
, {{R to scientific name}}
, {{R from scientific name}}
, {{R to monotypic taxon}}
and {{R from monotypic taxon}}
. It supports generic, plant, fish, fungus, spider, crustacean, reptile, and insect redirects. I have already switched {{R from alternative scientific name}} over, but I wanted to wait a week or so to see if any problems arise with that template before switching any others over to the module. Let me know if there are any objections. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:47, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Confusing template tag
editThe grammar would be easier to glean, especially for non-native speakers, if we inserted "instead"; changing the tag from:
- Use ({R to monotypic taxon}) when making a redirect to a monotypic taxon from its only member, for example, from a species to the genus of which it is the only member.
… into:
- Use ({R to monotypic taxon}) instead, when making a redirect to a monotypic taxon from its only member, for example, from a species to the genus of which it is the only member.
… or into:
- Instead use ({R to monotypic taxon}), when making a redirect to a monotypic taxon from its only member, for example, from a species to the genus of which it is the only member.
What's your perspective? Thecurran (talk) 02:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Done Seems a sensible clarification to me, so I've put the first of your options into effect. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)