Template talk:XfD relist
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Remove redundant wikitext comment?
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I think the wikitext comment <!-- Please add new comments below this line --> should be removed from this template. It makes the wikitext more complicated when the template is substituted, which in turn makes it harder to reply in these discussions. The text of the notice itself already says Please add new comments below this notice, I think the duplicated request is not necessary. Matma Rex talk 20:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Matma Rex:
Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Terasail[✉] 14:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Terasail: Indeed, I'm able to edit it, but didn't want to without consulting someone. I'll just go ahead and do it then. Matma Rex talk 21:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Which substitution
editDocumentation contains a notice box which specifies {{subst:XfD relist}}, while the examples further down specify {{subst:Relist}}. Are both forms valid for this template? Please clarify in the documentation; thank you. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 16:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Removing the lorem ipsum's
editI think we should remove the lorem ipsum in the main page and rather put them as an example, in the /doc page.
As of now, it suggests that the arguments around the template would be somehow included in the templates, maybe given as arguments.
If no one responds, I guess I'll just boldly go on with it. — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 11:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)