Template talk:Rfd top
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | Template:Rfd top is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
Adding content
editThis page needs {{TestTemplatesNotice}} for helpful reasons. What do you think?--Gh87 07:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- If you are suggesting a similar help box, I don't think it's really necessary as it's described at Wikipedia:Deletion process and anyone closing delete debates should be familiar with that page or shouldn't be doing it. However, it doesn't hurt anything so I don't object. If you are suggesting adding that particular notice, then that would be incorrect as it's instructions are wrong for this template. -- JLaTondre 14:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Are the XfDs debates or discussions?
editI haven't seen any true debates in AfD, RfD, CfD, TfD, or MfD, but I've seen many discussions. It seems more appropriate to modify the top boilerplate to say "The result of the discussion is" instead of the current wording. 147.70.242.40 (talk) 20:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}} I was the one who made the proposal above three months ago, with no apparent opposition here since. Since the RfD process involves a discussion and not a debate, will someone kindly change the "debate" in the boilerplate top to "discussion"? It makes much more sense this way. Thank you. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 21:46, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Hide closed discussion from log
editIn a sandbox I've created a version of this template that only shows outcome of the discussion on pages where the discussions are transcluded, including WP:RFD. The actual discussion is at WT:RFD#Hide closed discussions from transcluded pages. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 09:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Edit request for dark mode settings
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the dark mode settings from Template:Rfd top/sandbox into the primary template. Waqar💬 16:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- This will be a slight color change, but I suggest using #FFEEDD as the fallback background color instead of #fffff3 so that skins that don't have dark mode (all except Vector 2022 and Minerva/mobile) will not have any color change. SilverLocust 💬 21:52, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- SilverLocust done. It's much better; thanks for the suggestion. Waqar💬 06:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Done. SilverLocust 💬 06:41, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! Waqar💬 06:45, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- SilverLocust done. It's much better; thanks for the suggestion. Waqar💬 06:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)