Template talk:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies

(Redirected from Template talk:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies/doc)
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Trystan in topic peer-review parameter

Edit request, 6 October 2024 - Update categories following move

edit

Following a move of project categories, the following parameters need to be updated to include the Q+:

  • PR_CAT = Requests for LGBT studies peer review --> Requests for LGBTQ+ studies peer review
  • PR_OLD_CAT = Old requests for LGBT studies peer review --> Old requests for LGBTQ+ studies peer review
  • TF_1_ASSESSMENT_CAT= WikiProject LGBT studies - person articles --> WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies - person articles
  • TF_1_MAIN_CAT = WikiProject LGBT studies - person articles --> WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies - person articles--Trystan (talk) 19:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I posted a request at the Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_LGBTQ+_studies#Wikiproject_template_needs_urgent_update_to_fix_article_assessments to get attention to this as I think this Template talk is not watched a lot. Thanks for making the request itself. Raladic (talk) 19:05, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Done Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I think there is smth wrong going with the assessment cat though. Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Template-protected edit request on 6 October 2024

edit

Change

  • TF_1_ASSESSMENT_CAT= WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies - person articles

should instead be

  • TF_1_ASSESSMENT_CAT= LGBTQ+ studies - person articles

thanks Raladic (talk) 19:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Ymblanter followup from above - yes - the assessment category doesn't have "WikiProject" as a prefix. Raladic (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
And apparently I also somehow missed to nominate Category:Old requests for LGBT studies peer review for move to Category:Old requests for LGBTQ+ studies peer review, I'll list it for CFDS now so you can move it in 48 hours and then update the template to LGBTQ+ studies, unless you want to do that move right now? Raladic (talk) 19:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I updated the assessment which apparently caused a bunch of issues (assessment categories not created). For the old requests, they are already updated in the template, I will move the cat in 48h, if something falls into cracks in these 48h it will be back when the category is moved. Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good, I formally listed the Old requests one at CFDS.
Oh it looks like they should have WikiProject in the prefix, so I was wrong - refer to Category:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies - person articles and Category:B-Class_WikiProject_LGBTQ+_studies_-_person_articles respectively.
can you try this:
TF_1_ASSESSMENT_CAT= WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies - person articles
TF_1_MAIN_CAT = WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies - person articles
At least based on how the template was previously before the category moves, that should work I think? Thanks. Raladic (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok yes, I got the missing link now, it should be WikiProject for both per my last comment here, but the missing link was a manual Category:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies - person articles by quality which also existed for the old page (see Category:WikiProject LGBT studies - person articles by quality, so I created this missing manual redirect, so now it will work fine if you do:
TF_1_ASSESSMENT_CAT= WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies - person articles
TF_1_MAIN_CAT = WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies - person articles
I tested it in the Template:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies/sandbox.
Can you please make this one last update @Ymblanter and then we should be good for now until the "Old requests" cat is moved :)
Thanks so much for your help and apologies for the churn. Raladic (talk) 19:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I think I have done it, pls let me know if something needs to be fixed. Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, looks good now.
Once the two categories I missed in my nomination are moved in two days (I listed them at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Speedy#Current_requests) we should be all good, but at least the main assessments and tracking ones are good now, so should all be back in working order.
Thanks for your help. Raladic (talk) 20:07, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

peer-review parameter

edit

It would be helpful to deprecate the peer-review parameter in the documentation, to reflect that WP:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies/Peer review is inactive and peer review requests can instead be made at WP:Peer review. However, we would want to keep the documentation for old-peer-review and title parameters, which are still used for historical peer reviews that were done. The difficulty is that all of the peer review documentation is transcluded from {{WPBannerDoc/peerreview}}.--Trystan (talk) 19:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply