Template talk:World Series Year
(Redirected from Template talk:World Series Year/doc)
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Swarm in topic Noinclude
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | This template was considered for deletion on 21 October 2011. The result of the discussion was "snowball keep". |
TfD request
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add {{Tfd|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}} to the template page. I have nominated the template for deletion here. Powers T 21:08, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Done Added {{Tfd|{{subst:PAGENAME}}|type=inline}} instead, since this seems to be an inline template. Anomie⚔ 23:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Changed type=tiny. --slakr\ talk / 05:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Noinclude
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
How about some noinclude tags so the TfD doesn't mess up highly visable pages. CTJF83 00:04, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- I concur. Seriously messing up the look of countless articles during their highest viewership of the year. -- preschooler@heart 04:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done, sorry for the disgusting delay on this. :( Swarm X 07:08, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Disgusting? I followed procedure on this. Don't blame me when people complain that they don't know the template is up for deletion. Powers T 13:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks!....That's what the TfD page is for :) CTJF83 18:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- What? Is someone blaming you for something? The "disgusting delay" I was referring to was simply the delay in an admin getting to this request (7 hours!!!). The notice was being transcluded onto thousands of pages, including World Series-related pages at their peak viewing period, it was disrupting other templates, the discussion has received tons of participation and is snowing in favor of keep. Preventing transclusion was simply a common sense solution. Swarm X 20:58, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Disgusting? I followed procedure on this. Don't blame me when people complain that they don't know the template is up for deletion. Powers T 13:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done, sorry for the disgusting delay on this. :( Swarm X 07:08, 23 October 2011 (UTC)