Template talk:Xmark
 | Template:Xmark is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Request edit
editRequest edit to alt text to match graphic "Red X" rather than saying "No" which is what it does now. Why? Because it is also used to note "false", "refused", "unreliable", etc. ~ R.T.G 00:58, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 15 October 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. @SMcCandlish: please check to make sure that I did this correctly, and feel free to perform any merging. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 04:43, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Template:Cross → Template:Xmark – Swap the template name and the redirect to it. "Cross" is highly ambiguous (most often refers to this shape: ✝). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 16:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose that specific name but not opposing changing the name. The naming of these is symbol icons is always all over the place. There is a template called Template:X mark and I'm opposed to having templates with an almost exact name except for a space. We have Template:X mark big which is bigger and Template:Nay which is smaller. We also have Template:X mark-n and Template:N& which are of a different style. Not sure why we need so many x marks. --Gonnym (talk) 17:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Gonnym: Template:X mark was actually redundant, and is now just a wrapper for what is presently
{{Cross}}, which is itself the result of previous mergers. Template:X mark should probably also be merged into it. It differs only in using black at slightly smaller size, and could be mass-replaced by{{cross|color=black|16}}, then be redirected. Or "X mark" itself might actually make a better final page name for the main template than "Xmark". The point of this RM is not to be the end of cleanup, but the restart of a new round of it. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 02:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)- I could support merging those two with the end title being "X mark". --Gonnym (talk) 09:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Gonnym: Template:X mark was actually redundant, and is now just a wrapper for what is presently
- @SMcCandlish: is the proposal to move the template to mainspace or did you mean Template:Xmark? Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Derp! Fixed. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 18:08, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.