Terminal High Altitude Area Defense
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), formerly Theater High Altitude Area Defense, is an American anti-ballistic missile defense system designed to intercept and destroy short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic missiles in their terminal phase (descent or reentry).[3][4] The THAAD interceptor carries no warhead, instead relying on its kinetic energy of impact to destroy the incoming missile. THAAD was developed after the experience of Iraq's Scud missile attacks during the Gulf War in 1991.[5]
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) | |
---|---|
Type | Mobile anti-ballistic missile system |
Place of origin | United States |
Service history | |
In service | 2008–present |
Used by | United States Army |
Production history | |
Designer | Lockheed |
Designed | 1992–1999 |
Manufacturer | Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control |
Unit cost | $1.25 billion per battery $12.6 million per missile (FY2017)[1] |
Produced | 2008–present |
No. built | numerous |
Specifications | |
Mass | 2,000 lb (900 kg)[2] |
Length | 20 ft 3 in (6.17 m)[2] |
Diameter | 13 in (340 mm) (booster); 15 in (370 mm) (kill vehicle)[2] |
Engine | Single-stage rocket |
Propellant | Pratt & Whitney solid-fueled rocket |
Operational range | 120 mi (200 km)[2] |
Flight ceiling | 93 mi (150 km)[2] |
Maximum speed | 6,300 mph (2,800 m/s; 10,000 km/h; Mach 8.2)[2] |
Guidance system | Indium-antimonide imaging infra-red seeker head |
Accuracy | 0 ft (hit to kill) |
Transport | TEL |
Originally a United States Army program, THAAD has come under the umbrella of the Missile Defense Agency.[6] The Navy has a similar program, the sea-based Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System, which also has a land component ("Aegis Ashore"). THAAD was originally scheduled for deployment in 2012, but initial deployment took place in May 2008.[7][8] THAAD has been deployed in the United Arab Emirates, Israel, Romania, and South Korea.
On 17 January 2022, THAAD made its first operational interception of an incoming hostile medium-range ballistic missile in the UAE.[9]
Development
editThe THAAD missile defense concept was proposed in 1987, with a formal request for proposals submitted to industry in 1991.[10] The THAAD program benefited from results of previous missile defense efforts like High Endoatmospheric Defense Interceptor (HEDI) and the Kinetic Kill Vehicle Integrated Technology Experiment (KITE).[11] In September 1992, the US Army selected Lockheed, now Lockheed Martin, as the prime contractor for THAAD development.
Prior to the development of a physical prototype, the Aero-Optical Effect (AOE) software code was developed to validate the intended operational profile of Lockheed's proposed design. In April 1995, the first THAAD flight test occurred , with all flight tests in the demonstration-validation (DEM-VAL) program phase occurring at White Sands Missile Range. The first six intercept attempts missed the target (Flights 4–9). The first successful intercepts were conducted on 10 June 1999 and 2 August 1999, against Hera missiles.
The vulnerability and lethality analyses of THAAD have been conducted by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL). The vulnerability assessment for the THAAD featured an evaluation of the effects of major electromagnetic elements. This included EM interference, EM radiation operations, EM radiation hazards, EM pulse, electrostatic discharge, and lightning effects on components of the THAAD system.[12]
The ARL assessments were designed to determine the THAAD system's growth potential given its tactical design as well as provide survivability analysis against threats such as conventional weapons, chemical weapons, and electronic warfare countermeasures.[13] The data collected from the analyses were used to develop trajectory models for targets and missile as well as target trajectories using infrared scene generation of infrared countermeasures (IRCMs).[12]
The THAAD system is being designed, built, and integrated by Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control acting as prime contractor. Key subcontractors include Raytheon, Boeing, Aerojet Rocketdyne, Honeywell, BAE Systems, Oshkosh Defense, and MiltonCAT.[14]
Date | Result | Notes |
---|---|---|
21 April 1995 | Success | First test flight to prove the propulsion system. There was no target in the test. |
31 July 1995 | Aborted | Kill vehicle control test. The test flight was aborted. There was no target in the test. |
13 October 1995 | Success | Launched to test its target-seeking system. There was no attempt to hit the target in the test. |
13 December 1995 | Failure | Failed to hit a test target due to software errors in the missile's fuel system. |
22 March 1996 | Failure | Failed to hit a test target due to mechanical problems with the kill vehicle's booster separation. |
15 July 1996 | Failure | Failed to hit a test target due to a malfunction in the targeting system. |
6 March 1997 | Failure | Failed to hit a test target due to a contamination in the electrical system. |
12 May 1998 | Failure | Failed to hit a test target due to an electrical short circuit in the booster system. At this point, the U.S. Congress reduced funding for the project due to repeated failures. |
29 March 1999 | Failure | Failed to hit a test target due to multiple failures, including guidance system. |
10 June 1999 | Success | Hit a test target in a simplified test scenario. |
2 August 1999 | Success | Hit a test target in the thermosphere at an altitude of 91 mi (147 km) |
Engineering and manufacturing
editIn June 2000, Lockheed won the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) contract to turn the design into a mobile tactical army fire unit. In 2006, flight tests of this system resumed with missile characterization and full system tests at White Sands Missile Range, then moved to the Pacific Missile Range Facility. The Interceptor was led through development and initial production by Tory Bruno, who later became the CEO of United Launch Alliance.
Date | Result | Notes |
---|---|---|
2005-11-22 | Success | Launched a missile in its first Flight EMD Test, known as FLT-01. The test was deemed a success by Lockheed and the Pentagon.[17] |
2006-05-11 | Success | FLT-02, the first developmental flight test to test the entire system, including interceptor, launcher, radar, and fire control system.[18] |
2006-07-12 | Success | FLT-03. Intercepted a live target missile.[19] |
2006-09-13 | Aborted | Hera target missile launched, but had to be terminated in mid-flight before the launch of the FLT-04 missile. This has officially been characterized as a "no test".[citation needed] |
Fall 2006 | Cancelled | FLT-05, a missile-only test, was postponed until mid-spring 2007.[citation needed] |
2007-01-27 | Success | FLT-06. Intercepted a "high endo-atmospheric" (just inside Earth's atmosphere) unitary (non-separating) target representing a "SCUD"-type ballistic missile launched from a mobile platform off Kauai in the Pacific Ocean.[20] |
2007-04-06 | Success | FLT-07 test. Intercepted a "mid endo-atmospheric" unitary target missile off Kauai in the Pacific Ocean. It successfully tested THAAD's interoperability with other elements of the MDS system.[21][22] |
2007-10-27 | Success | Conducted a successful exo-atmospheric test at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) off Kauai, Hawaii. The flight test demonstrated the system's ability to detect, track and intercept an incoming unitary target above the Earth's atmosphere. The missile was hot-condition tested to prove its ability to operate in extreme environments.[23][24] |
2008-06-27 | Success | Downed a missile launched from a C-17 Globemaster III.[25] |
2008-09-17 | Aborted | Target missile failed shortly after launch, so neither interceptor was launched. Officially a "no test".[26] |
2009-03-17 | Success | A repeat of the September flight test. This time it was a success.[27] |
2009-12-11 | Aborted | FLT-11: The Hera target missile failed to ignite after air deployment, and the interceptor was not launched. Officially a "no test".[28] |
2010-06-29 | Success | FLT-14: Conducted a successful endo-atmospheric intercept of unitary target at lowest altitude to date. Afterward, exercised Simulation-Over-Live-Driver (SOLD) system to inject multiple simulated targets into the THAAD radar to test system's ability to engage a mass raid of enemy ballistic missiles.[29] |
2011-10-05 | Success | FLT-12: Conducted a successful endo-atmospheric intercept of two targets with two interceptors.[30] |
2012-10-24 | Success | FTI-01 (Flight Test Integrated 01): test of the integration of THAAD with PAC-3 and Aegis against a raid of 5 missiles of different types.[31] During this engagement THAAD successfully intercepted an Extended Long Range Air Launch Target (E-LRALT) missile dropped from a C-17 north of Wake Island.[32] This marked the first time THAAD had intercepted a Medium Range Ballistic Missile (MRBM).[32] Two AN/TPY-2 were used in the $180M test, with the forward-based radar feeding data into Aegis and Patriot systems as well as THAAD.[33] |
2017-07-11 | Success | FTT-18 (Flight Test THAAD 18): The FTT-18 test plan was announced to the public on 8 July 2017.[34] The first test of THAAD against an IRBM,[35] FTT-18 successfully occurred on 11 July 2017; an Alaska-based THAAD interceptor, launched from the Pacific Spaceport Complex – Alaska on Kodiak island, intercepted its target over Alaska airspace. The FTT-18 target simulated an intermediate-range ballistic missile. It was "launched" near Hawaii from the cargo hold of a C-17, being initially dropped by parachute. From there the mock IRBM proceeded in a north-easterly direction until reaching Alaskan airspace, where it was intercepted.[36][37] |
2017-07-30 | Success | FET-01 (Flight Experiment THAAD 01): In FET-01, the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) gathered threat data from a THAAD interceptor in flight. THAAD detected, tracked, and intercepted a medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM), which was launched from a C-17 by parachute.[38] Soldiers from the 11th ADA Brigade conducted launcher, fire control, and radar operations without foreknowledge of the launch time. The MDA director, Lieutenant General Sam Greaves stated: "In addition to successfully intercepting the target, the data collected will allow MDA to enhance the THAAD weapon system, our modeling and simulation capabilities, and our ability to stay ahead of the evolving threat."[39] |
THAAD-ER
editLockheed is pushing for funding for the development of an extended-range (ER) version of the THAAD, to counter maturing threats posed by hypersonic glide vehicles that adversaries may deploy, namely the Chinese WU-14, to penetrate the gap between low- and high-altitude missile defenses. The company performed static fire trials of a modified THAAD booster in 2006 and continued to fund the project until 2008. The current 14.5 in (37 cm)-diameter single-stage booster design would be expanded to a 21 in (53 cm) first stage for greater range with a second "kick stage", to close the distance to the target and provide improved velocity at burnout and more lateral movement during an engagement.[41][42]
Although the kill vehicle would not need redesign, the ground-based launcher would have only five missiles instead of eight. As of 2020, THAAD-ER is only an industry concept, but Lockheed believes that the Missile Defense Agency will show interest because of the weapons under development by potential adversaries.[41][43] If funding for the THAAD-ER begins in 2020, a system could be produced by 2024 to provide an interim capability against a rudimentary hypersonic threat. The Pentagon is researching whether other technologies like directed energy weapons and railguns are better solutions for missile defense. These are expected to become available in the mid to late 2020s.[44]
Production
editSometimes called Kinetic Kill technology, the THAAD missile destroys missiles by colliding with them, using hit-to-kill technology, like the MIM-104 Patriot PAC-3, although the PAC-3 also contains a small explosive warhead. This is unlike the Patriot PAC-2, which carried only an explosive warhead detonated using a proximity fuze. Although the actual figures are classified, THAAD missiles have an estimated range of 125 miles (200 km), and can reach an altitude of 93 miles (150 km). A THAAD battery consists of at least six[45] launcher vehicles, each equipped with eight missiles, with two mobile tactical operations centers (TOCs) and the AN/TPY-2 ground-based radar (GBR).[46]
The U.S. Army plans to field at least six THAAD batteries,[41] at a purchase cost of US$800 million per battery.[47] In September 2018, the MDA planned to deliver 52 more interceptors to the Army.[48][6] In June 2020 the Senate Armed Services Committee draft of the FY2021 DoD budget allocated funding for the eighth THAAD battery.[49]
The THAAD missile is manufactured at a Lockheed Martin facility near Troy, Alabama. The facility performs final integration, assembly and testing of the THAAD missile. The THAAD Radar is an X-Band active electronically scanned array Radar developed and built by Raytheon at its Andover, Massachusetts Integrated Air Defense Facility. The THAAD radar and a variant developed as a forward sensor for ICBM missile defense, the Forward-Based X-Band – Transportable (FBX-T) radar, were assigned a common designator, AN/TPY-2,[50] in late 2006/early 2007. The THAAD radar can interoperate with Aegis and Patriot systems, in a 3-layer antimissile defense.[51][52][53]
First units equipped (FUE)
editOn 28 May 2008, the U.S. Army activated Alpha Battery, 4th Air Defense Artillery Regiment (A-4),[54] 11th Air Defense Artillery Brigade at Fort Bliss, Texas. Battery A-4 is part of the 32nd Army Air & Missile Defense Command. At the time, the battery had 24 THAAD interceptors, three THAAD launchers based on the M1120 HEMTT Load Handling System, a THAAD Fire Control and a THAAD radar. Full fielding began in 2009.[55] In October 2009, the U.S. Army and the Missile Defense Agency activated the second Terminal High Altitude Area Defense Battery, Alpha Battery, 2nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment (A-2), at Fort Bliss.[56]
In August 2012, Lockheed received a $150 million contract from the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to produce THAAD Weapon System launchers and fire control and communications equipment for the U.S. Army. The contract included 12 launchers, two fire control and communications units, and support equipment. The contract provided six launchers for THAAD Battery 5 and an additional three launchers each to Batteries 1 and 2. These deliveries will bring all batteries to the standard six launcher configuration.[57]
General missile defense plans
editIn May 2017, the Pentagon proposed spending $7.9 billion in its FY 2018 budget on missile defense, which includes THAAD interceptors and Patriot interceptors, along with $1.5 billion for Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) against intercontinental ballistic missiles.[58]
Deployments
editIsrael
editIn 2012, the U.S. AN/TPY-2 early missile warning radar station on Mt. Keren in the Negev desert was the only active foreign military installation in Israel.[59]
In March 2019, Bravo Battery, 2nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment (B-2 THAAD), 11th Air Defense Artillery Brigade[60] was deployed at Nevatim Airbase during a joint US-Israeli drill, after which it moved to an undisclosed location in the Negev desert in southern Israel.[61] The X-Band radar system, which is part of the THAAD system, has been deployed at Nevatim since 2008.[62]
On October 13, 2024, President Biden directed Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin to authorize the deployment of a THAAD battery to Israel to "help bolster Israel's air defenses following Iran's unprecedented attacks against Israel on April 13 and again on October 1."[63]
Romania
editIn 2019, while the Aegis Ashore at NSF Deveselu was being upgraded, B Battery, 62nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment (B-62 THAAD), was emplaced in NSF Deveselu, Romania during the interim.[64][65]
South Korea
editIn October 2013, the South Korean military asked the Pentagon to provide information on the THAAD system concerning prices and capabilities as part of efforts to strengthen defenses against North Korean ballistic missiles.[66] However, South Korean Park Geun-hye administration decided it will develop its own indigenous long-range surface-to-air missile instead of buying the THAAD.[67] South Korean Defense Ministry officials previously requested information on the THAAD, as well as other missile interceptors like the Israeli Arrow 3, with the intention of researching systems for domestic technology development rather than for purchase. Officials did however state that American deployment of the THAAD system would help in countering North Korean missile threats.[68][69] In May 2014, the Pentagon revealed it was studying sites to base THAAD batteries in South Korea.[70]
The deployment was opposed by China and Russia.[71][72][73][74] In February 2016, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said that having THAAD in South Korea would "shatter the regional strategic balance" and that the system exceeded South Korea's need.[75] In 2017, a Chinese military official said that the deployment had a negative influence on "bilateral military ties and mutual trust" with the United States.[76] Western experts say that the range of THAAD's radar and interceptors should not pose a threat to China, and the U.S. has had similar capabilities in Taiwan and Japan for years.[77]
Chinese officials believe that its location in South Korea would allow THAAD's radar to detect Chinese missile launches from behind during their boost phase and differentiate between decoys and warheads, sharing information with the rest of the U.S.-led network. This would erode China's nuclear deterrence, which has a much smaller stockpile compared to the United States and Russia. Missile tests in China usually pointed away from Korea, but that trajectory may also need to be reversed in order to minimize detection by THAAD.[78] Chinese officials asked South Korea to downgrade the radar of the missile defence system, but no adjustments were made.[79]
In July 2016, American and South Korean military officials announced the deployment of THAAD system in South Korea, following ballistic missile and nuclear tests by North Korea. Each THAAD unit consists of six truck-mounted launchers, 48 interceptors, a fire control and communications unit, and an AN/TPY-2 radar.[80] Seongju County in North Gyeongsang Province was chosen as a THAAD site, partly because it is out of range of North Korean rocket artillery along the DMZ.[81] This sparked protests from Seongju County residents, who feared that radiation emitted by the AN/TPY-2 radar would impact their health, and damage the region's famed oriental melon crop.[82] On 30 September 2016, the U.S. and South Korea announced that THAAD would be relocated to the Lotte Skyhill Seongju Country Club, farther from the town's main residential areas and higher in elevation, to alleviate concerns.[83][84][85]
On 6 March 2017, two THAAD launcher trucks arrived by air transport at Osan Air Base South Korea, for a deployment.[86][87][88][89] Earlier that day, North Korea had launched 4 missiles.[87][86] A Reuters article stated that with the THAAD defense system, a North Korean missile barrage would still pose a threat to South Korea,[90] while an article in the International Journal of Space Politics & Policy said that South Korean forces already possess Patriot systems for point defense and Aegis destroyers capable of stopping ballistic missiles that may come from the north,[52][page needed][original research?] in a three-layer antimissile defense for South Korea.[51] On 16 March 2017, a THAAD radar arrived in South Korea.[91] The THAAD system is kept at Osan Air Base[92] until the site where the system is due to be deployed is prepared, with an expected ready date of June 2017.[93] Osan Air Base has blast-hardened command posts with 3 levels of blast doors.[92]: minute 0:45
By 25 April 2017, six trailers carrying the THAAD radar, interceptor launchers, communications, and support equipment entered the Seongju site.[94][95] On 30 April 2017, it was reported that South Korea would bear the cost of the land and facilities for THAAD, while the US will pay for operating it.[96] On 2 May 2017, Moon Sang-gyun, with the South Korean Defense Ministry, and Col. Robert Manning III, a spokesman for the U.S. military, announced that the THAAD system in Seongju is operational and "has the ability to intercept North Korean missiles and defend South Korea."[97]
It was reported that the system would not reach its full operational potential until later in 2017, when additional elements of the system were onsite.[98] On 7 June 2017 President Moon Jae-in suspended further THAAD deployment pending a review, after discovering four additional launchers had entered South Korea without the defense ministry informing him.[99][100] The 35th Air Defense Artillery Brigade (United States) has integrated THAAD into its layered defense on the Korean Peninsula,[101] denoted Combined Task Force Defender, composed of both US and ROK personnel.[102]
Even in the face of a North Korean ICBM test on 4 July 2017, which newly threatens Alaska, a Kodiak, Alaska-based THAAD interceptor test (FTT-18)[48] against a simulated attack by an Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile had long been planned.[103] FTT-18 was successfully completed by Battery A-2 THAAD (Battery A, 2nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment, Terminal High Altitude Area Defense)[104] of the 11th Air Defense Artillery Brigade (United States) on 11 July 2017.[35][37] The soldiers used the procedures of an actual combat scenario and were not aware of the IRBM's launch time.[104]
Also in 2017 another Kodiak launch of a THAAD interceptor was scheduled in July, in preparation for a possible ICBM test by North Korea.[105] On 28 July 2017 North Korea launched a test ICBM capable of reaching Los Angeles.[106] In response, President Moon Jae-in called for deployment of the four remaining THAAD launchers which were put on hold when he came to power.[107][108]
Lee Jong-kul, of South Korean President Moon Jae-in's Democratic Party of Korea stated "The nuclear and missile capabilities of North Korea…have been upgraded to pose serious threats; the international cooperation system to keep the North in check has been nullified...", citing tensions over the U.S. deployment of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense anti-missile system in South Korea.[109][110][111][112][113] The Atlantic Council, in the June 2017 memorandum "Eliminating the Growing Threat Posed by North Korean Nuclear Weapons" to President Trump, recommended a checklist of actions, including the following declarations to North Korea.[114][115]
- No use of WMDs, or it will result in a unified Korea under Seoul after the North's assured destruction.
- No export of nuclear equipment or fissile material; it will be intercepted, and the US will respond.
- No missile or missile test aimed at ROK (South Korea), Japan, or the US; it can then be shot down or pre-empted.[114]
On 30 July 2017, a Kodiak-sited THAAD interceptor shot down an MRBM which launched over the Pacific Ocean, the 15th successful test.[116] The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) director emphasized the data collection from the intercept, which enhances the modelling and scenario simulation capabilities of the MDA.[117] John Schilling estimates the current accuracy of the North's Hwasong-14 as poor at the mooted ranges[118] which threaten US cities,[119] which would require more testing[120][121][122] to prove its accuracy.[118]
In August 2017, The New York Times reviewed the anti-missile options that are available to counter a planned salvo of four Hwasong-12 missiles, were they to be launched in mid-August 2017 from the North, and aimed to land just outside the territorial waters of Guam,[123] a distance of 2,100 miles (3,400 km), flying at altitudes exceeding 60 miles (100 km), in a flight of 1,065 seconds (18 minutes).[124] These options for the missile defense of South Korea include "sea-based, Patriots and THAAD" according to General John E. Hyten, commander of U.S. Strategic Command.[125]
On 2 September 2017, the North Korean news agency KCNA released a photograph of an elongated payload,[126] intended to fit in the warhead of one of its missiles.[127] On 3 September 2017 both Japan's Foreign Ministry and the South Korean Joint Chiefs announced the detection of a magnitude 6.3 seismic event, centered near Punggye-ri, which is North Korea's underground nuclear test site.[128] Japan's Foreign Ministry has concluded that the event was the North's sixth nuclear test.[129]
Choe Sang-hun of the New York Times reports that the test was a major embarrassment for China's Paramount leader Xi Jinping, who was hosting a BRICS summit (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) in Xiamen, China. Cheng Xiaohe, an expert on North Korea at China's Renmin University, said the timing of the test appears to be deliberate.[130] China's Foreign Ministry urged the North to "stop taking wrong actions",[131] and agreed that further UN actions are needed to resolve the impending crisis.[132] By creating a thermonuclear-capable payload for at least one of its missiles,[133] the North has created a need for THAAD, which is capable of intercepting ICBM threats at the lower altitudes and ranges[118] estimated for a Hwasong-14 ICBM subjected to the load of a heavier warhead needed to carry a thermonuclear weapon.
In September 2017, BBC analyst Jonathan Marcus predicted a flood of several million refugees at the border of North Korea and China, were the North to be destroyed.[134] China has positioned only two brigades at the border. Marcus points out that China and Russia have proposed the de-nuclearization of Korea and the replacement of the armistice with a peace treaty.[134]
In October 2017, Battery D, 2nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment, Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, reflagged with the 35th Air Defense Artillery Brigade in preparation for a permanent change of station to South Korea.[102] In the interim before THAAD D-2's permanent transfer to South Korea with their families, THAAD Battery A-4 will deploy to South Korea.[102]
The South Korean decision to deploy THAAD to protect itself against North Korea caused backlash and retaliation measures from China.[135][136][137] On 30 October 2017, South Korea and China agreed to normalize relations, previously damaged due to the THAAD deployment.[138]
Turkey
editAccording to U.S. officials the AN/TPY-2 radar was deployed at Turkey's Kürecik Air Force base.[139] The radar was activated in January 2012.[140]
United Arab Emirates
editIn December 2011, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) signed a deal to purchase the missile defense system.[141] The United Arab Emirates (UAE) graduated its first two THAAD unit classes at Fort Bliss in 2015 and 2016.[142] Its first live-fire exercises with Patriot missiles took place in 2014.
On 17 January 2022, THAAD made its first real-world intercept against an incoming Houthi ballistic missile in the UAE.[9]
United States
editHawaii
editIn June 2009, the United States deployed a THAAD unit to Hawaii, along with the SBX sea-based radar, to defend against a possible North Korean launch targeting the archipelago.[143]
Guam
editIn April 2013, the United States declared that Alpha Battery, 4th Air Defense Artillery Regiment (A-4), would be deployed to Guam to defend against a possible North Korean IRBM attack targeting the island.[144][145] In March 2014, Alpha Battery, 2nd ADA RGT (A-2), did a change of responsibility with A-4 and took over the Defense of Guam Mission. After a successful 12-month deployment by A-4, Delta 2 (D-2) took its place for a 12-month deployment. In 2018-2019 Echo Battery, 3rd ADA Regiment (E-3) deployed to Guam.
Wake Island
editIn November 2015, a THAAD system was a key component of Campaign Fierce Sentry Flight Test Operational-02 Event 2 (FTO-02 E2), a complex $230 million missile defense system test event conducted at Wake Island and the surrounding ocean areas.[146] The objective was to test the ability of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense and THAAD Weapon Systems to defeat a raid of three near-simultaneous air and missile targets, consisting of one medium-range ballistic missile, one short-range ballistic missile and one cruise missile target. During the test, a THAAD system on Wake Island detected and destroyed a short-range target simulating a short-range ballistic missile[146]: intercepts @1:13 & 3:12 that was launched by parachute ejected from a C-17 transport aircraft. At the same time, the THAAD system and the USS John Paul Jones guided missile destroyer both launched missiles to intercept a medium-range ballistic missile,[146]: intercepts @2:50 & 3:12 launched by parachute from a second C-17.[147][148]
Future deployments: firm orders and possible plans
editEurope and the Middle East
editBy March 2016, Army Space and Missile Defense Command was considering THAAD deployments to Europe with EUCOM and the Middle East with CENTCOM.[149]
Japan
editIn November 2015, Japanese Defense Minister Gen Nakatani said he would consider the U.S. deploying the THAAD in Japan to counter the threat of North Korean ballistic missiles.[150] By October 2016, Japan was considering procuring either THAAD or Aegis Ashore to add a new missile defense layer.[151] In May 2017 it was reported that Japan government officials now favor the Aegis Ashore system as it comes with a wider coverage area, which would mean fewer units needed to protect Japan, and it is also cheaper.[152]
At the Center for a New American Security 2017 conference, citing publicly available sources and simulations of strikes against US bases in Asia,[153] two Navy Fellows, Commanders Shugart and Gonzalez, USN noted that two more Patriot batteries, two more Aegis ships, and five more THAAD batteries would counter China's published SRBM (short-range) and MRBM (medium-range) capabilities against Japan.[154]
Russia has opposed the missile acquisitions[155] and fears that the US will have access to the management of Aegis Ashore missile defense complexes after their deployment in Japan. "We do not know of any cases anywhere in the world when the United States deployed its weapons and transferred control over them to the country in whose territory it all happened. I very much doubt that they will make an exception and in this case," concluded the Russian Foreign Minister.[156][discuss]
In 2020, Japan suspended plans to acquire the Aegis Ashore system.[157] The Japanese government said that they were concerned about environmental issues caused by the system dropping spent boosters.[158] Local citizens of the areas chosen to place the system also protested the acquisition, saying that such placement would guarantee strikes on their homes during wartime.[159] As of 2020[update] the Japanese government had not made it clear whether or not they would re-evaluate purchasing THAAD systems.[160]
Oman
editIn May 2013, Oman announced a deal for the acquisition of the THAAD air defense system.[161] However, a sale has not been announced.[162]
Saudi Arabia
editIn October 2017, the US reached a deal to provide Saudi Arabia with THAAD, in a deal worth $15 billion.[163] The deal included seven fire units, each with a Raytheon AN/TPY-2 radar, two mobile tactical stations (with two spares for a total of 16), and six launchers (with two spares for a total of 44), and 360 interceptor missiles.[164]
Taiwan
editIn 2017, a Hong Kong–based media report claimed that THAAD could be deployed in Taiwan to intercept People's Republic of China missiles.[165] However, Taiwan's Foreign Minister, David Lee, said he was unaware of any talks with the US about possible deployment. Local military experts said that it was neither necessary nor affordable for Taiwan to deploy THAAD because China is threatening Taiwan with short-range missiles, whereas THAAD is designed to shoot down medium and long-range missiles.[166]
In March 2017, the Minister of National Defense, Feng Shih-kuan, said that he was firmly opposed to the deployment of a THAAD system in Taiwan. Feng's deputy minister, Cheng De-mei, during a Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee Q&A session held in April 2017, said that Taiwan did not need a THAAD system in the short term because its US-made phased-array radar system at Hsinchu County’s Leshan base was on par with the THAAD system in terms of detection capability; this was described as being "in slight contrast with Minister of National Defense Feng Shih-kuan's last month."[167]
Freddy Lim urged the ministry during the same Q&A session "to procure whatever is necessary to ensure the nation’s defense capabilities, which could not be compromised due to China's pressure."[167] Taiwan's existing early warning system, built by the manufacturer of the THAAD radar, can serve to counter China's missile launches.[168][169]
Operators
editThe US has 7 batteries of THAAD, which will expand to 8 batteries in the future.[170]
- United States Army
- A Battery, 2nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment (A-2 ADA)
- B Battery, 2nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment (B-2 ADA)
- D Battery, 2nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment (D-2 ADA)
- E Battery, 3rd Air Defense Artillery Regiment (E-3 ADA)
- A Battery, 4th Air Defense Artillery Regiment (A-4 ADA)
- B Battery, 62nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment (B-62 ADA)
- E Battery, 62nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment (E-62 ADA)
See also
edit- Arrow (Israeli missile)
- Comparison of anti-ballistic missile systems
- HQ-19 – (China)
- L-SAM – (South Korea)
- MIM-104 Patriot – (United States)
- Prithvi Defence Vehicle—Indian high altitude anti-ballistic missile system
- Project Kusha, under development by India
- S-300VM – (Russia)
- S-500 – (Russia)
- Taiwan Sky Bow Ballistic Missile Defense System
References
edit- ^ "Australia can do better than THAAD or Iron Dome defences". Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
- ^ a b c d e f Wade, Mark; Parsch, Andreas. "THAAD". Encyclopedia Astronautica. Archived from the original on 23 April 2021. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
- ^ Development of a Hit-to-Kill Guidance Algorithm for Kinetic Energy Weapons, 1988. Archived 27 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Mehta, Aaron (25 February 2016). "PACOM Head Supports Exercises Near China, Talks THAAD". Defense News.
- ^ "Naver Dictionary: THAAD", Naver Dictionary.
- ^ a b Judson, Jen (14 August 2019). "Slippery slope: MDA boss fights transfer of missile defense system to Army". Defense News.
- ^ Singer, Jeremy (5 September 2006). "Pentagon To Accelerate THAAD Deployment". space.com. Archived from the original on 10 February 2009.
- ^ "Lockheed Martin completes delivery of all components of 1st THAAD battery to U.S. Army". Your Defence News. 8 March 2012. Archived from the original on 30 November 2012.
- ^ a b Judson, Jen; Gould, Joe (21 January 2022). "THAAD, in first operational use, destroys midrange ballistic missile in Houthi attack". Defense News. Retrieved 5 October 2023.
- ^ https://news.usni.org/2024/10/17/report-to-congress-on-the-terminal-high-altitude-area-defense-thaad-system.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ Atkinson, James W. (13 August 1996). "The Theater High Altitude Area Defense program: an interim examination of its acquisition strategy". Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School;Springfield, Va.: Available from National Technical Information Service – via Internet Archive.
- ^ a b "Envisioning the Army of the Future, 1998-2001". United States Army Research Laboratory. 1 March 2011. Retrieved 17 August 2018.
- ^ "Army Research Laboratory. 1999 Annual Review". Army Research Laboratory. January 1999. Archived from the original on 11 June 2017 – via Defense Technical Information Center.
- ^ Barnes, Julian E.; Entous, Adam (3 April 2013). "U.S. to Send Missile-Defense Battery to Guam". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660.
- ^ a b THAAD Demonstration-Validation program.
- ^ "Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)". Missile Threat. Retrieved 21 October 2024.
- ^ "Successful THAAD Interceptor Launch Achieved" Archived 3 September 2006 at the Wayback Machine, 22 November 2005.
- ^ Successful THAAD Integrated System Flight Test Archived 18 June 2006 at the Wayback Machine, 11 May 2006.
- ^ Successful THAAD Intercept Flight Archived 20 July 2006 at the Wayback Machine, 12 July 2006.
- ^ Successful THAAD "High Endo-Atmospheric" Intercept Test Archived 30 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine, 27 January 2007.
- ^ "MDA's new THAAD success" Archived 9 April 2007 at the Wayback Machine, Martin Sieff, UPI, 6 April 2007.
- ^ "Army, Navy and Air Force shoot down test missile" Archived 24 July 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Tom Finnegan, Honolulu Star-Bulletin, 6 April 2007.
- ^ "Press Release by Lockheed Martin on Newswires". Texas: Prnewswire.com. 26 October 2007. Archived from the original on 10 February 2009. Retrieved 24 January 2011.
- ^ "31st successful 'hit to kill' intercept in 39 tests". Frontierindia.net. 27 October 2007. Archived from the original on 30 October 2007. Retrieved 24 January 2011.
- ^ "THAAD shoots down missile from C-17". The Associated Press, 27 June 2008.
- ^ Defense Test Conducted[permanent dead link ] MDA, 27 September 2008.
- ^ "Terminal High Altitude Area Defense". MDA. 17 March 2009. Archived from the original on 26 March 2009.
- ^ "Officials investigating cause of missile failure". The Garden Island. 12 December 2009. Archived from the original on 30 October 2020. Retrieved 12 December 2009.
- ^ "THAAD System Intercepts Target in Successful Missile Defense Flight Test". MDA. 29 June 2010. Archived from the original on 11 August 2011.
- ^ "THAAD Weapon System Achieves Intercept of Two Targets at Pacific Missile Range Facility". Lockheed Martin. 5 October 2011. Archived from the original on 9 December 2011.
- ^ "FTI-01 Mission Data Sheet" (PDF). Missile Defense Agency. 15 October 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 October 2012.
- ^ a b "Ballistic Missile Defense System Engages Five Targets Simultaneously During Largest Missile Defense Flight Test in History". Missile Defense Agency. 25 October 2012. Archived from the original on 16 February 2013.
- ^ Butler, Amy (5 November 2012). "Pentagon Begins To Tackle Air Defense 'Raid' Threat". Aviation Week & Space Technology. Archived from the original on 27 March 2013.
- ^ US to test THAAD missile defense system: Report.
- ^ a b Stewart, Phil; Ali, Idrees (12 July 2017). "U.S. THAAD missile defenses hit test target as North Korea tension rises". Reuters.
- ^ "US successfully tests THAAD amid North Korean missile tensions". Foxnews.com, 11 July 2017.
- ^ a b FTT-18 THAAD Flight Test Video (July 11, 2017) 2:25 minute clip.
- ^ FET-01 (30 July 2017) video clip.
- ^ (3 August 2017) 11th ADA THAAD intercepts test target, again[usurped].
- ^ "Ballistic Missile Defense Intercept Flight Test Record" (PDF). mda.mil. 30 May 2017. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2017.
- ^ a b c "China's Hypersonic Ambitions Prompt Thaad-ER Push | Aviation Week Network". aviationweek.com. 8 January 2015.
- ^ "Lockheed Martin providing THAAD to US and Saudi Arabia - Land Warfare - Shephard Media". www.shephardmedia.com. 2 April 2019. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
- ^ "Lockheed Martin providing THAAD to US and Saudi Arabia - Land Warfare - Shephard Media". www.shephardmedia.com. 2 April 2019. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
- ^ "Thaad-ER In Search Of A Mission | Aviation Week Network". Aviation Week. 20 January 2015.
- ^ Lamothe, Dan (7 March 2017). "U.S. military deploys advanced defensive missile system to South Korea, citing North Korean threat". The Washington Post.
- ^ "U.S. Army has received the latest upgrade for THAAD air defense missile system". Army Recognition. 2 January 2015. Archived from the original on 4 January 2015.
- ^ Sisk, Richard (18 March 2017). "Amid Tough Talk on North Korea, US Wants More THAAD Interceptors". Defense Tech. Archived from the original on 19 March 2017. Retrieved 1 April 2017.
- ^ a b Stewart, Phil (8 July 2017). "Exclusive: U.S. plans to test THAAD missile defenses as North Korea..." Reuters.
- ^ Freedberg Jr, Sydney J. (24 June 2020). "SASC Trims Hypersonics & Robot Ships, Boosts Ships & F-35". Breaking Defense.
- ^ "Raytheon: Army Navy/Transportable Radar Surveillance (AN/TPY-2)". Raytheon Corporate. Archived from the original on 5 July 2013.
- ^ a b "THAAD on the Korean Peninsula". isdp.eu. November 2016. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
THAAD is inter-operable with other BMDS, making it possible to have an integrated air and missile defense system. THAAD can also be used against weapons of mass destruction, i.e., chemical, nuclear and biological warheads.
- ^ a b De Leon Petta Gomes da Costa (16 March 2016). "Chinese Geopolitics: Space Program Cooperation among China, Brazil, and Russia". Astropolitics: The International Journal of Space Politics & Policy. 14 (1): 90–98. Bibcode:2016AstPo..14...90D. doi:10.1080/14777622.2016.1148465. ISSN 1477-7622. OCLC 300873391. S2CID 218622093.
- ^ Sauter, Dan; Kazianis, Harry J. (19 November 2014). "THAAD: America's Super Shield against Ballistic Missiles?". The National Interest. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
- ^ Unit numbering: e.g., "Battery D, 2nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment" would abbreviate as 'D-2' on its guidon
- ^ "First Battery of THAAD Weapon System Activated at Fort Bliss". Lockheed Martin (Press release). 28 May 2008. Archived from the original on 29 July 2021. Retrieved 17 April 2024.
- ^ "Second Battery of Lockheed Martin's THAAD Weapon System Activated at Fort Bliss". Reuters. 16 October 2009. Archived from the original on 7 September 2012. Retrieved 20 October 2009.
- ^ "Lockheed Martin Receives $150 Million Contract To Produce THAAD Weapon System Equipment For The U.S. Army". Lockheed Martin (Press release). 15 August 2012. Retrieved 17 April 2024.
- ^ Burns, Robert. "Leery of N. Korea, U.S. plans 1st test to shoot down intercontinental-range missile". USA Today. Retrieved 28 May 2017.
- ^ Vick, Karl; Aaron J., Klein (30 May 2012). "How a U.S. Radar Station in the Negev Affects a Potential Israel-Iran Clash". Time Magazine. Archived from the original on 30 May 2012.
- ^ David Burge (20 March 2019) B-2 THAAD deploys to Israel: 11th ADA Bde. unit participates in joint rapid deployment exercise[usurped]
- ^ Julian, Hana Levi (4 March 2019). "US Army Deploys THAAD, Most Advanced Aerial Defense System, in Southern Israel". The Jewish Press.
- ^ Harel, Amos; Kubovich, Yaniv; Landau, Noa (4 March 2019). "In First, U.S. Deploys THAAD Missile Defense System in Israel in Joint Drill". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 6 December 2021.
- ^ "Statement by Pentagon Press Secretary Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder on the Deployment of a THAAD Bat". U.S. Department of Defense. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
- ^ Epperson, Jason (23 May 2019). "US deploys THAAD anti-missile system in first deployment to Romania". army.mil.
- ^ "NATO a finalizat actualizarea tehnică a sistemului de apărare antibalistică AEGIS de la Deveselu". Radio Free Europe (in Romanian). 9 August 2019.
- ^ "Army of South Korea shows interest for the U.S. THAAD Terminal High Altitude Area Defense". Army Recognition. 18 October 2013.
- ^ "S. Korea to develop indigenous missile defense system instead of adopting THAAD". Sina.com. 3 June 2014. Archived from the original on 5 June 2014.
- ^ "'S.Korea Requested Information on THAAD to Develop L-SAM'". world.kbs.co.kr. 5 June 2014. Archived from the original on 25 May 2015.
- ^ Smith, Alexander (26 March 2017). "North Korea's Missile Failure Won't Stop Kim Jong Un Trying to Strike U.S." NBC News.
- ^ "United States Army has a plan to deploy THAAD air defense missile systems in South Korea". Army Recognition. 29 May 2014.
- ^ Kai, Jin (18 April 2015). "The Other Reasons China Wants to Block THAAD Deployment". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 4 July 2019.
- ^ Mody, Seema (28 April 2017). "China lashes out as South Korea puts an American anti-missile system in place". CNBC. Archived from the original on 3 July 2019. Retrieved 4 July 2019.
- ^ Patranobis, Sutirtho (13 January 2017). "China, Russia vow to deploy measures against US missiles in South Korea". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 11 February 2020. Retrieved 4 July 2019.
- ^ Zhou, Laura (8 July 2016). "China and Russia criticise THAAD missile defence system as destabilising region". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 28 May 2019. Retrieved 28 May 2019.
- ^ Shalal, Andrea; Stewart, Phil (25 February 2016). "China cites concerns on U.S. missile defense system in South Korea". Reuters.
- ^ Blanchard, Ben; Martina, Michael (17 August 2017). Perry, Michael; Fernandez, Clarence (eds.). "China military criticizes 'wrong' U.S. moves on Taiwan, South China Sea". Reuters.
- ^ Buckley, Chris (11 March 2017). "Why U.S. Antimissile System in South Korea Worries China". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 March 2017.
- ^ Bin, Li (6 March 2017). "The Security Dilemma and THAAD Deployment in the ROK". chinausfocus.com.
- ^ Perez, Jane (8 July 2016). "For China, a Missile Defense System in South Korea Spells a Failed Courtship". New York Times. Retrieved 26 September 2016.
- ^ Judson, Jen (8 July 2016). "THAAD To Officially Deploy to South Korea". Defense News.
- ^ Seung-woo, Kang (12 July 2016). "Seongju picked as site for THAAD battery". The Korea Times.
- ^ Padden, Brian (15 July 2016). "THAAD Radiation Fears Spark South Korean Protests". Voice of America.
- ^ Chang, Yoo Kyong; Gamel, Kim (30 September 2016). "THAAD's new home will be golf course in South Korean mountains". STARS AND STRIPES.
- ^ "S. Korea selects golf course as new site for THAAD". Yonhap News Agency. 30 September 2016.
- ^ Se-jeong, Kim (13 July 2016). "Seongju residents vow to fight against THAAD". The Korea Times. Retrieved 18 September 2018.
- ^ a b Osan AirBase (6 March 2017). "THAAD Deploys to Republic of Korea". YouTube. Retrieved 7 March 2017.
- ^ a b Johnson, Alex; Kube, Courtney; Kim, Stella (6 March 2017). "U.S. Begins Shipping Controversial Anti-Missile System to South Korea". NBC News. Retrieved 6 March 2017.
- ^ "THAAD arrives on the Korean Peninsula". usfk.mil. 6 March 2017.
- ^ Mullany, Gerry (6 March 2017). "U.S. Starts Deploying Thaad Antimissile System in South Korea, After North's Tests". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 7 March 2017.
- ^ Pearson, James (8 March 2017). "Even with THAAD defense, North Korea missile barrage poses threat to South". Reuters.
- ^ Shim, Elizabeth (16 March 2017). "THAAD radar arrives in South Korea over Chinese opposition". upi.com. Retrieved 21 March 2017.
- ^ a b A view of the command posts at Osan Air base: 'Fight Tonight': Rare look at US defense against North Korea access-date=2017-04-16
- ^ Taylor, Adam (7 March 2017). "Why China is so mad about THAAD, a missile defense system aimed at deterring North Korea". The Washington Post.
- ^ Fifield, Anna (26 April 2017). "U.S. starts 'swiftly' installing controversial antimissile battery in South Korea". The Washington Post. Retrieved 26 April 2017.
- ^ Blanchard, Ben (4 May 2017). "China urges all sides in North Korea standoff to 'stop irritating'..." Reuters.
- ^ "US won't seek South Korean money for THAAD". Fox News. 30 April 2017.
- ^ Sang-Hun, Choe (2 May 2017). "U.S. Antimissile System Goes Live in South Korea". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
- ^ "US anti-missile system operational in South Korea". BBC News. 2 May 2017.
- ^ Maresca, Thomas (7 June 2017). "South Korean President Moon Jae-in suspends further THAAD deployment". USA Today. Retrieved 11 September 2017.
- ^ Chandran, Nyshka (26 July 2017). "North Korea is more erratic than ever, but South Korea is in no rush for US missile defense". CNBC. Retrieved 11 September 2017.
- ^ Daniell, Capt. Jonathon (13 June 2017). "35th ADA BDE welcomes new commander". army.mil.
- ^ a b c Daniell, Capt. Jonathon (20 October 2017). "THAAD battery reflags to align with 35th ADA Brigade in South Korea". army.mil.
- ^ Starr, Barbara; Cohen, Zachary (7 July 2017). "US to test THAAD missile defense system". CNN.
- ^ a b A-2 THAAD successfully intercepts missile target Fort Bliss Bugle (20 July 2017)[usurped] access-date=2017-07-20
- ^ Park, Madison (25 July 2017). "Coast Guard gives notice: Missile launch expected in Alaska". CNN.
- ^ Ali, Idrees; Kim, Jack (30 July 2017). "North Korea claims all of U.S. in strike range as Trump says China has done "nothing"". Reuters.
- ^ Kim, Jack (28 July 2017). Stonestreet, John (ed.). "South Korea's Moon orders talks with U.S. to deploy more THAAD units after North Korea ICBM test". Reuters.
- ^ Oliphant, James; Shepherd, Christian (8 September 2017). "Trump - 'Sad day' for North Korea if U.S. takes military action". Reuters.
- ^ Burton, John. (26 July 2017) "Moon's nuclear option" The Korea Times (a sister publication of Hankook Ilbo 한국일보)] Quote: Absent a North Korean response to the request for de-nuclearization talks, South Korea has mooted its nuclear options: "If North Korea continues to conduct nuclear weapon and missile tests while the North Korean nuclear negotiations are sluggish, South Korea should decide whether to break the principle of denuclearization and start developing nuclear weapons," —Lee Jong-kul.
- ^ Lockie, Alex (27 July 2017). "China holds live-fire aircraft carrier drill, builds massive border force as North Korean missile test looms". Business Insider.
- ^ Lockie, Alex (25 July 2017). "China's army looks like it's getting ready for something big to go down in North Korea". Business Insider.
- ^ Lockie, Alex (16 March 2017). "How China could stop a US strike on North Korea — without starting World War III". Business Insider.
- ^ Taylor, Adam (1 December 2021). "Analysis | The inevitability of North Korea's nuclear weapons". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286.
- ^ a b Pavel, Barry and Robert A. Manning (27 June 2017) "Eliminating the Growing Threat Posed by North Korean Nuclear Weapons" Archived 29 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine (pdf). The Atlantic Council
- ^ Sang-Hun, Choe; Sanger, David E. (29 July 2017). "After North Korea Test, South Korea Pushes to Build Up Its Own Missiles". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
- ^ (30 July 2017) US military hits target missile in THAAD interceptor test Interception at minute 1:04 of 1:20 video clip duration
- ^ Lynch, Sarah N. (30 July 2017). "U.S. THAAD missile hits test target amid growing pressure from..." Reuters.
- ^ a b c Schilling, John (10 July 2017). "What is True and Not True About North Korea's Hwasong-14 ICBM: A Technical Evaluation". 38 North.
- ^ Ali, Idrees (August 2017). "North Korea can hit most of United States: U.S. officials". Reuters.
- ^ Broad, William J.; Sanger, David E. (31 July 2017). "Success of North Korean Missile Test Is Thrown Into Question". The New York Times.
- ^ Payload Breakup Video: nhk static camera setup on Hokkaido island 26-second video clip
- ^ Elleman, Michael (31 July 2017). "Video Casts Doubt on North Korea's Ability to Field an ICBM Re-entry Vehicle". 38 North.
- ^ Doyle, Gerry (11 August 2017). "If Missiles Are Headed to Guam, Here Is What Could Stop Them". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
- ^ Kim, Christine (9 August 2017). "North Korea will develop Guam strike plan by mid-August: KCNA". Reuters.
- ^ Pellerin, Cheryl (24 August 2017). "U.S., South Korean Military Leaders Reinforce Alliance". defense.gov.
- ^ Mason, Jeff (7 September 2017). "Trump says U.S. not 'putting up with' North Korea's actions". Reuters.
- ^ Brumfiel, Geoff (3 September 2017). "Here Are The Facts About North Korea's Nuclear Test". NPR.org.
- ^ Jeffrey Lewis (13 September 2017) SAR image of Punggye-ri Note especially the 'before and after' comparison of Mount Mantap, a subsidence of several meters spread over 85 acres, in the grey-scale gif which superimposed images of 26 August and 6 September 2017.
- ^ Joshua Berlinger; Taehoon Lee (3 September 2017). "Nuclear test conducted by North Korea, country claims". CNN.
- ^ Sanger, David E.; Sang-Hun, Choe (2 September 2017). "North Korean Nuclear Test Draws U.S. Warning of 'Massive Military Response'". The New York Times.
- ^ Said-Moorhouse, Lauren (3 September 2017). "Nuclear test in North Korea: Live updates". CNN.
- ^ Oliphant, James (8 September 2017). "Trump: 'Sad day' for North Korea if U.S. takes military action". Reuters.
- ^ Kim, Stella; Helsel, Phil; Bruton, F. Brinley; Silva, Daniella (4 September 2017). "North Korea says it tested hydrogen bomb that can fit in intercontinental missile". NBC News.
- ^ a b Marcus, Jonathan (4 September 2017). "North Korea: Does latest nuclear test mean war?". BBC News.
- ^ Patranobis, Sutirtho (13 January 2017). "China, Russia vow to deploy measures against US missiles in South Korea". Hindustan Times.
- ^ Lee, Kim Min Tayler' (9 January 2016). "THAAD: Missile defense or diplomatic challenge?". Culture Mandala: The Bulletin of the Centre for East-West Cultural and Economic Studies. 12 (1): Article 5. Archived from the original on 29 July 2017.
- ^ Mody, Seema (28 April 2017). "China lashes out as South Korea puts an American anti-missile system in place". CNBC.
- ^ Kim, Christine (31 October 2017). "China, South Korea agree to mend ties after THAAD standoff". Reuters. Archived from the original on 31 October 2017.
- ^ "U.S. Maintains Full Control of Turkish-Based Radar" Defense News, 30 January 2012
- ^ Demirtas, Serkan (24 December 2011). "NATO Activates Radar in Turkey Next Week". Turkish Weekly. Archived from the original on 2 February 2014.
- ^ "U.S., UAE reach deal for missile-defense system". CNN. 30 December 2011.
- ^ UAE graduates second class of THAAD air defenders[usurped]
- ^ Gienger, Viola (18 June 2009). "Gates Orders Measures Against North Korea Missile (Update2)". Bloomberg. Retrieved 24 January 2011.
- ^ "US to move missiles to Guam after North Korea threats". BBC. 3 April 2013. Retrieved 3 April 2013.
- ^ Burge, David (9 April 2013). "100 bound for Guam: Fort Bliss THAAD unit readies for historic mission". El Paso Times. Archived from the original on 29 June 2013. Retrieved 12 April 2013.
- ^ a b c "2015 THAAD FTO2 Event2a". YouTube. 5 November 2015. Retrieved 14 July 2016.
- ^ "USS John Paul Jones participates in ballistic missile defense test" Archived 5 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Ho'okele – Pearl Harbor – Hickam News, 6 November 2015.
- ^ Shalal, Andrea (1 November 2015). "U.S. completes complex test of layered missile defense system". Reuters.
- ^ Judson, Jen (22 March 2016). "Army Weighing THAAD Deployments in Europe, Middle East". Defense News.
- ^ Japan is considering deployment of US missile defense system including the THAAD – Armyrecognition.com, 24 November 2015
- ^ "Japan may accelerate missile defense upgrades in wake of North Korean tests: sources". Reuters.com, 17 October 2016
- ^ "Japan favors Aegis Ashore over THAAD to boost missile defense: sources". Reuters. 13 May 2017. Retrieved 9 August 2017.
- ^ Shugart and Gonzalez (28 June 2017) First Strike: China's Missile Threat to U.S. Bases in Asia. Center for a New American Security
- ^ Freedberg Jr, Sydney J (28 June 2017). "Chinese Missiles Can Wipe Out US Bases In Japan: Aegis, THAAD Can Stop Em". Breaking Defense.
- ^ Kurtenbach, Elaine. "Russia says US missile systems in Asia a risk to regional security". Times of Israel. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
- ^ "МИД РФ выразил опасения в связи с возможным контролем США над ПРО в Японии". Interfax. 15 January 2018.
- ^ Unbehauen, Michael; Decker, Christian (25 September 2020). "Japan Cancels Aegis Ashore: Reasons, Consequences, and International Implications". Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs. Retrieved 7 July 2024.
...Japan's reversal on the Aegis Ashore sites may indicate a larger shift in defense priorities for the country and potentially signal a transitional trend with implications beyond Japan and the Indo-Pacific region.
- ^ Panda, Ankit (23 June 2020). "Japan Suspends Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Plans. What Happens Now?". The Diplomat. Retrieved 7 July 2024.
...according to the Japanese government, the primary reason for not proceeding with deployment at this time pertains to environmental concerns: specifically, the matter of spent boosters from Standard Missile 3 interceptor missiles potentially dropping over inhabited territory.
- ^ Panda, Ankit (23 June 2020). "Japan Suspends Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Plans. What Happens Now?". The Diplomat. Retrieved 7 July 2024.
...the Japanese government has been dealing with fierce local opposition to the deployment of the sites. The candidate sites in Akita and Yamaguchi prefectures weren't too popular with locals, who had concerns that the sites would all but ensure that their homes would be high-value targets for North Korean missiles in a conflict.
- ^ Panda, Ankit (23 June 2020). "Japan Suspends Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Plans. What Happens Now?". The Diplomat.
It's possible that Tokyo may revisit the option to procure THAAD, but cost was one factor in the Aegis Ashore suspension too. Given that the sticker price for the six THAAD batteries was greater than that for two Aegis Ashore sites back in the 2017 evaluations, it's unlikely that Tokyo will go this way.
- ^ "Sultanate of Oman to buy the air defense missile system THAAD from United States". Army Recognition. 27 May 2013.
- ^ "Oman: Politics, Security, and U.S. Policy" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. 1 June 2022.
- ^ "Thaad: US to sell $15bn missile defence to Saudi Arabia". 6 October 2017.
- ^ Binnie, Jeremy (9 October 2017). "Saudi THAAD sale approved". Janes.com. Archived from the original on 11 October 2017.
- ^ Everington, Keoni (15 February 2017). "THAAD may be deployed in Taiwan". Taiwan News. Archived from the original on 15 February 2017.
- ^ Yeh, Joseph (10 March 2017). "Could Taiwan be up next in THAAD trouble?". The China Post. Archived from the original on 17 April 2017.
- ^ a b Chen Wei-han (6 April 2017). "Taiwan would welcome F-35 jet sales: ministry". Taipei Times.
- ^ "PAVE PAWS Radar System". spaceforce.mil. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
- ^ "A Dossier on the Pave Paws Radar Installation on Leshan, Taiwan" (PDF). Federation of American Scientists.
- ^ "Lockheed Martin to Produce Eighth THAAD Battery for the US Government".
External links
edit- Lockheed Martin THAAD web page
- MDA THAAD page
- THAAD program details
- THAAD program history on designation-systems.net
- TPY-2 X-band Radar on Missile Threat CSIS site
- DEM-VAL and EMD testing