United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, 350 U.S. 11 (1955), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that expanded the rights of citizens to civilian trials, holding that an ex-serviceman cannot be court-martialed for crimes alleged during his military service.
| Toth v. Quarles | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued February 8, 1955 Reargued October 13, 1955 Decided November 7, 1955 | |
| Full case name | United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, Secretary of the Air Force |
| Citations | 350 U.S. 11 (more) 76 S. Ct. 1; 100 L. Ed. 2d 8 |
| Reargument | Reargument |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Toth v. Talbott, 114 F. Supp. 468 (D.D.C. 1953); reversed sub. nom. Talbott v. United States ex rel. Toth, 215 F.2d 22 (D.C. Cir. 1954); cert. granted, 348 U.S. 809 (1954). |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Black, joined by Warren, Frankfurter, Douglas, Clark, Harlan |
| Dissent | Reed, joined by Burton, Minton |
| Dissent | Minton, joined by Burton, Reed |
The United States Air Force alleged that the petitioner, Robert W. Toth, committed a murder while he was on active duty in Korea. (On Sept 27, 1952 while on guard duty at a air base in South Korea, Toth and airman Thomas Kinder had taken into custody a drunken South Korean Civilian named Bang Soon Kil who had grabbed at Toth arm who then pistol-whipped the Civilian. Toth and Kinder were ordered by their superior Lt George Schreiber to kill Bang. Schreiber and Kinder then still in the military were court-martialed: Schreiber was sentenced to life in prison (reduced to 5 years in prison; forfeiture of pay and dishonorable discharge; he served 20 months before being dismissed from service); Kinder was sentenced to life sentence (reduced to two years in prison and a dishonorable discharge; the discharge was later suspended, allowing him to return to service).[1] They argued that while they knew about the murder while Toth was in the armed forces, they didn't know the identity of the man who did it so Toth was honorably discharged. Donald A. Quarles, at the time the Secretary of the Air Force, argued that as the crimes occurred during Toth's military service, the military could constitutionally try him.[2]
The case mostly dealt with the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), a 1950 law passed by the 81st United States Congress and signed by President Harry S. Truman, and whether or not certain provisions of it were constitutional; that is to say, whether or not Congress could deprive ex-service members of their Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights.[2]
In the majority opinion, decided 6–3, Justice Hugo Black wrote that "[the UCMJ] is not a valid exercise of the power granted Congress in Article I of the Constitution."[3] The decision in Quarles would prove as an important precedent which the Court would rely on two years later in the landmark Reid v. Covert ruling.[4] Whereas Quarles dealt with the case of an ex-servicemember, Covert would deny the government the ability to try any US citizen by military tribunal, even citizens abroad. This important precedent was re-affirmed in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004), where the Court ruled that while the US government may detain enemy combatants abroad, those detained must have "the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority" for the detention to be constitutional.[5]
Those who dissented gave various reasons. While Justice Sherman Minton agreed that civilians "not under the jurisdiction of the Military Code" have a right to a civilian trial, he argued that the Court had erred because Toth was not a "full-fledged civilian".[6] Justice Stanley F. Reed on the other hand, argued that the solution to the question should have come from Congress amending the UCMJ and not via a Court order.[7]
As regards Toth, civilian authorities would never retry him; a 1989 article in the Military Law Review declares: "Toth literally got away with murder."[8]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ Encylopeida Toth vs Quarles
- ^ a b 350 U.S. 11 (1955) (Syllabus)
- ^ 350 U.S. 11 (1955) (Opinion of the Court)
- ^ 354 U.S. 1 (1957) "Just last Term, this Court held in United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, 350 U. S. 11, that military courts could not constitutionally try a discharged serviceman for an offense which he had allegedly committed while in the armed forces. [...] There are no supportable grounds upon which to distinguish the Toth case from the present cases. Toth, Mrs. Covert, and Mrs. Smith were all civilians. All three were American citizens. All three were tried for murder. All three alleged crimes were committed in a foreign country."
- ^ 542 U.S. 507 (2004)
- ^ 350 U.S. 11 (1955) (Dissent of J. Minton)
- ^ 350 U.S. 11 (1955) (Dissent of J. Reed)
- ^ Weiner, Frederick Bernays (1989). American military law in light of the first Mutiny Act's tricentennial. Vol. 126. United States Army.
{{cite book}}:|work=ignored (help)
External links
edit- Text of United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, 350 U.S. 11 (1955) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)