United States v. Salvucci 448 U.S. 83 (1980) was a Supreme Court case ruling that "automatic standing" to file a Fourth Amendment claim based on mere possession of a seized item lacks constitutional merit.[1] [2]
United States v. Salvucci | |
---|---|
Argued March 26, 1980 Decided June 25, 1980 | |
Full case name | United States v. John Salvucci |
Citations | 448 U.S. 83 (more) |
Case history | |
Prior | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT, v. JOHN M. SALVUCCI, JR., JOSEPH G. Zackular, 1979 United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit 599 F.2d at 1098 |
Subsequent | Reversed and remanded |
Holding | |
Mere possession of a seized good during an illegal search does not automatically entitle a person to file a Fourth Amendment deprivation claim. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by Stevens, White, Stewart, Powell, Burger, Blackmun |
Dissent | Marshall, joined by Brennan |
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | |
Jones v. United States (1960) |
Background
editIn 1978, John Salvucci and Joseph Zackular were federally indicted on 12 counts of stolen mail possession.[3] They filed a motion to suppress the checks during trial, arguing the affidavit supporting the search warrant lacked probable cause. The District Court agreed; the Court of Appeals upheld the suppression order based on the defendants' standing. [4]
Decision
editIn a 7-2 majority opinion delivered by Justice William Rehnquist, the Court ruled that simple possession of a seized item does not justify standing by itself. Instead, those who have "a legitimate expectation of privacy in the invaded place" possess merit to file a Fourth Amendment claim.
Marshall's Dissent
editJustice Thurgood Marshall, joined by Justice Brennan, posits that the automatic standing rule eliminates the "wasteful" requirement of pretrial preliminary standing hearings in possession cases.
References
editExternal links
edit- Text of United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83 (1980) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)