User:Azg20/Distinctive feature/Eric.collazo94 Peer Review
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
(provide username)Azg20
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Azg20/Distinctive_feature?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Distinctive feature
Evaluate the drafted changes
edit(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
Overall, you provided good details on distinctive feature and I liked how you added the first distinctive feature theory that was created by Jakobson in 1941.This was a good example to show how other people had theories. The Laryngeal features and manner features had good descriptions of the role they play in articulation. One thing that you should maybe add is the definition of phoneme since some people may not know what that word means. Also add a small piece of info of what origin is the manner and laryngeal symbols from.