User:Batuolana/False Advertising/Hunter.browne Peer Review
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Batuolana
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Batuolana/False_Advertising?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_advertising[1]
Evaluate the drafted changes
editI think that overall, they are really great additions. I think that changing the spelling of concidered to considered is something that is a minor fix. I also think that explaining a little more about what the use of false or misleading is tied to. Like is is statements or what specifically. I would change the spelling of wither to either. I would also reword that last sentence so that it is not as long. The sources are very reliable, and the tone of the additions are neutral. It is straight facts with the bias left out. That alone is very important. The lead is there, but like many others, we both need to add to that. All the links work and are correct. I think that only thing that needs to be changed is just looking over the spelling and the structures of the sentences, but the content is exactly what is needed. I looked at the article, and it said that it needs more verified sources so it will be able to contribute to better the article. I also really appreciated that they said even the section from the source where they retrieved the information from.
- ^ "False advertising", Wikipedia, 2022-03-15, retrieved 2022-03-21