Byers99

Article critique

I visited the Gymkhana page on Wikipedia, and found three aspects of it worth commenting on. the article is very up to date, the content is all very correct and I also noticed it could use a few more in text citations.

The Gymkhana page was very well put together. I was pleasantly surprised by the amount of information on this sport. After I read through the article I came to the conclusion that everything is very up-to-date and it wasn't heavily lacking in any area in particular. I was able to add a little bit of content to the National Saddle Club association category of the page, I was able to add what events the national Saddle Club association runs .As far as the content goes everything that is cited comes from a very reliable sources leading me to believe that the content is all true. I was able to click on all the links and everything worked, I went and checked all of the sources and all of them were very reputable associations. Many of them dating back to the 1950s. One of the other things I did when I went to the association's pages was I went and clicked on their Rule books to cross referenced the information that was on the Wikipedia page to the information that was in there rule book. It was very cool to see everything line up. The last thing I wanted to talk about was the pages problem. It could use more in text citations about what content is coming from what rule book. That would make the content more reputable if it was able to be cited back to the original source of what rule book it came out of. Overall, this page was very nicely put together and there were not very many holes, that needed filling in to make this page very informative and reliable.