User:Nixeagle/Talk/Archive/19
_(1).JPG){kind=link}
I6 and speedy tags
editI'm curious what you are up to. You have tagged a bunch of images inappropriately with the I6 speedy criteria that specifically says which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days. None of these images have been tagged, let alone tagged for 7 days. Is this a case of you accidentally using the wrong template? Because cat:csd is filling up with images, when images have their own subcats. Also, I am confused why, if you think they meet the speedy criteria, you haven't just deleted them yourself (making me again think you simply used the wrong tag). Anyway, just curious what's going on. Thanks.-Andrew c [talk] 00:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
For I6, which is missing fair use rationale, we have {{subst:nrd}}. I believe the WP:CSD page lists the proper templates to use. If you come across other images, such as orphaned non-free, or improper copyright, etc there are specific tags for those as well. Good luck.-Andrew c [talk] 00:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
about the 2 pics
editHi, I am sorry for releasing the pics into the public domain. I uploaded the same picture again but this time I use the license of screenshot of a copyrighed game.
I hope that is okay, hope to get a reply soon! =)
Images
editIt is written!!! www.araldicacivica.it, with regular authorization. Ciao (PS, my idea is that you could better waste your time in adding some useful encyclopedical contain to Wikipedia...) --Attilios 09:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Why
editI don't understand why the images must be reduced to a lower resolution when I was the one who took the photos.
- Ah, I see. Thanks. One more question: What sort of copyright is held on the images for the game peices?
- Well there is no tab pull down for parts of board game, etc. What could it be labeled as?
Image copyright problem with Image:Asdfapsdhfpeghpafdsa.jpg
edit
Thank you for uploading Image:Asdfapsdhfpeghpafdsa.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Asdfasdfsad.jpg
edit Thank you for uploading Image:Asdfasdfsad.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Asdfapsdhfpeghpafdsa.jpg
edit Thank you for uploading Image:Asdfapsdhfpeghpafdsa.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Advice about handling spam situation
editEagle, you were right about Akc9000. He seems to have settled down and become a productive contributor. I've taken your advice in handling some difficult situations within the Scientology articles, and both sides of that dispute seem to respect me for being fair. Thanks. Jehochman Talk 07:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Undelete
editCan you unprotect deleted article Pretty Crane? The article was created before the character appeared on Passions, but now has been cast. Her article has been created at Pretty Crane (Passions character) because the original link is locked. TAnthony 18:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XV - August 2007
editThe August 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:06, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Features article fair use images
editGiven the extensive Talk:Main Page#Fair use image on the main page?, I've been thinking it would be good if we have an easy way to know whan a fair use image is used in a newly scheduled TFA. Would it be possible for Gnome Bot to check the TFAs and when one is scheduled with a fair use image, post a warning in some centralised page that can easily be monitored? I thought it would be easier to set up a bot to do it rather then ask Raul Nil Einne 20:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
_(1).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Do you know what the deal is with this image? It says it's a file link to itself.. — Moe ε 01:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
:Image:20070530 Bronze cow cast.JPG and Image:20070530 Bronze cow cast (1).JPG do this as well... same uploader too.. — Moe ε 01:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Found the reason why: [1] No more file links to themselves.. — Moe ε 01:47, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Wimb chat bot
editWimb chat bot seems unable to blacklist users with a space in their name, any way around this?Blacksmith2 talkEditor Review 23:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Errors on User:Eagle 101/FU
editMost of the listings have listed the uploaded in error (appear to be listing the last person to have editing the image description page). — xaosflux Talk 03:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi Eagle, my friend! I don't feel very happy about WP:CSN residing in purgatory. Do you think we can come up with a new name for the board, and perhaps new procedures to address the concerns raised at its MfD? The problem this board can solve, in my view, is long term disruptive editing. What do we do with a user who's been blocked many times but doesn't seem to get it? An indef block is a serious thing, and before implementing that, I think it's worthwhile to have a discussion and explain the reasons. This information should be archived somewhere for future reference in case the user requests an unblock. Does that make sense? If so, were would this information go? If you think this is worth discussion, we can go over to the appropriate talk page and propose changes. - Jehochman Talk 14:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Jehochman, I'm of the thought that if a user has been blocked multiple times and attempts to explain to them what they have been doing wrong are done in good faith, the user can safely be indef'd. Thats a community ban. As long as one admin is not willing to unblock, its a ban. Let me put it this way, if I were to for reasons unknown, indef you, at least one admin would unblock and give me quite a (deserved) lashing. If I kept it up, I'd probably lose the admin buttons. The point being I don't feel there really is much need for the drama fest that CSN is. A bit of history on that board, it used to be for community wide announcements (like the announcement you made on WP:AN), but it got changed into the Community Sanction noticeboard. ;) Just a bit of history. Anyway I'm willing to talk to you if you have questions. I'm on IRC most all the time and I can be contacted by e-mail as well, or you can chat here. :) —— Eagle101Need help? 18:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
The name of the case that you plan to open is Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Paranormal. Will the case be posted at AN? yes. Will the case be posted at CSN? yes. Change the "run" setting to yes to start me
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/My new case. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/My new case/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/My new case/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, —— Eagle101Need help? 08:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Eagle! Have you been naughty? - Jehochman Talk 14:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Nah I'm testing things for User:ArbComBot —— Eagle101Need help? 00:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
editUser IP 170.65.128.6 is continuing to vandalize pages. Just wanted to let you know. jj137Talk 00:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- I went ahead and blocked the IP.
Please re-register
edit
Hello, Nixeagle/Talk/Archive! You are receiving this notice because the Cleanup Taskforce has been inactive, as a result of this all active taskforce members are being asked to re-register.
For more information see: Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Not Dead Yet
If you do not re-register here within 15 days of receiving this notice your name will be removed from the membership list (if you were unable to reply to this notice in time, you can just add you name back).
RJFJR 01:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Your bot request
editHi Eagle 101 I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ArbComBot is labeled as needing your comment. Please visit the above link to reply to the requests. Thanks! --BAGBotTalk 21:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Request
editI would like to ask you to unblock User:YoSoyGuapo. I have mediated with him and the person has agreed to follow the established rules and policies of Wikipedia. I will keep my out on him and if he breaks our agreement, I will consider banning him myself. Cheers! Tony the Marine 05:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Arbcombot help
editI've been trying to use Arbcombot to open Dreamguy, but it's not working. Help would be appreciated. David Mestel(Talk) 18:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Toolserver archivesearch
editHi Eagle 101, just wanted to say how cool the archivesearch tool is!!! Seriously awesome. It would be great if two archives on Commons could be included: commons:Commons:Deletion requests (all subpages) and commons:Commons:Village pump/Index/commons:Commons:Village pump/Archive. (not quite sure how we ended up with two...)
Please let me know if/when it happens :) it would be super-useful. thanks!! --pfctdayelise (talk) 14:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)